Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ABDULLAH YALÇIN v. TURKEY (No. 2)

  Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9 - Positive obligations;Article 9-1 - Manifest religion or belief) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  YALÇIN v. TURKEY

  Art. 9, Art. 9 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 43835/11

  Gesichtsschleier-Verbot rechtens

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 34417/10

  The Court reiterates that Article 9 does not protect every act motivated or inspired by a religion or belief and does not always guarantee the right to behave in the public sphere in a manner which is dictated by one's religion or beliefs (see, for example, Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98, §§ 105 and 121, ECHR 2005-XI; S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 125, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 104, 26 April 2016).
• EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 44774/98

  LEYLA SAHIN v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 34417/10

  The Court reiterates that Article 9 does not protect every act motivated or inspired by a religion or belief and does not always guarantee the right to behave in the public sphere in a manner which is dictated by one's religion or beliefs (see, for example, Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98, §§ 105 and 121, ECHR 2005-XI; S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 125, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 104, 26 April 2016).
• EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 62649/10

  Türkei verurteilt - Aleviten diskriminiert

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 34417/10

  The Court reiterates that Article 9 does not protect every act motivated or inspired by a religion or belief and does not always guarantee the right to behave in the public sphere in a manner which is dictated by one's religion or beliefs (see, for example, Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98, §§ 105 and 121, ECHR 2005-XI; S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 125, ECHR 2014 (extracts); and Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 104, 26 April 2016).

 
• EGMR, 13.04.2006 - 55170/00

  KOSTESKI v.

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 34417/10

  This does not, nevertheless, prevent the Court from making factual findings as to whether an applicant's religious claims are genuine and sincerely held (see Skugar and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 40010/04, 3 December 2009, and Kosteski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 55170/00, § 39, 13 April 2006).
• EGMR, 07.06.2016 - 26012/11

  ENVER AYDEMIR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 34417/10

  Although not decisive, the Court also takes into account the fact that at no point during the domestic proceedings did any of the domestic authorities give any consideration to the question of whether the applicant had (or had not) been required to offer Friday prayers owing to his being deprived of his liberty (compare Enver Aydemir v. Turkey, no. 26012/11, § 79, 7 June 2016).
• EKMR, 12.03.1981 - 8160/78

  X. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 34417/10

  The Court notes that acts of worship of Islam, such as praying, either individually or in community with others, including Friday prayers fall within the ambit of Article 9 of the Convention (see Korostelev v. Russia, no. 29290/10, § 38, 12 May 2020; Masaev v. Moldova, no. 6303/05, §§ 19-26, 12 May 2009; and X v. the United Kingdom, no. 8160/78, Commission decision of 12 March 1981, Decisions and Reports 22, p. 27; see also Igors Dmitrijevs v. Latvia, no. 61638/00, § 79, 30 November 2006, where the applicant was prohibited from attending religious services at the prison chaplaincy; and Süveges v. Hungary, no. 50255/12, § 152, 5 January 2016, where the authorities denied leave to attend Mass to an applicant who was under house arrest).
• EGMR, 03.12.2009 - 40010/04

  SKUGAR AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 34417/10

  This does not, nevertheless, prevent the Court from making factual findings as to whether an applicant's religious claims are genuine and sincerely held (see Skugar and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 40010/04, 3 December 2009, and Kosteski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 55170/00, § 39, 13 April 2006).
• EGMR, 12.05.2020 - 29290/10

  KOROSTELEV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 34417/10

  The Court notes that acts of worship of Islam, such as praying, either individually or in community with others, including Friday prayers fall within the ambit of Article 9 of the Convention (see Korostelev v. Russia, no. 29290/10, § 38, 12 May 2020; Masaev v. Moldova, no. 6303/05, §§ 19-26, 12 May 2009; and X v. the United Kingdom, no. 8160/78, Commission decision of 12 March 1981, Decisions and Reports 22, p. 27; see also Igors Dmitrijevs v. Latvia, no. 61638/00, § 79, 30 November 2006, where the applicant was prohibited from attending religious services at the prison chaplaincy; and Süveges v. Hungary, no. 50255/12, § 152, 5 January 2016, where the authorities denied leave to attend Mass to an applicant who was under house arrest).
• EGMR, 05.01.2016 - 50255/12

  SÜVEGES v. HUNGARY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 34417/10

  The Court notes that acts of worship of Islam, such as praying, either individually or in community with others, including Friday prayers fall within the ambit of Article 9 of the Convention (see Korostelev v. Russia, no. 29290/10, § 38, 12 May 2020; Masaev v. Moldova, no. 6303/05, §§ 19-26, 12 May 2009; and X v. the United Kingdom, no. 8160/78, Commission decision of 12 March 1981, Decisions and Reports 22, p. 27; see also Igors Dmitrijevs v. Latvia, no. 61638/00, § 79, 30 November 2006, where the applicant was prohibited from attending religious services at the prison chaplaincy; and Süveges v. Hungary, no. 50255/12, § 152, 5 January 2016, where the authorities denied leave to attend Mass to an applicant who was under house arrest).
• EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 2723/07

  ABDULLAH YALÇIN c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.06.2022 - 34417/10

  In a previous application lodged by the same applicant, the Court has already found a breach of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, holding that the length of the applicant's pre-trial detention was excessive (see Abdullah Yalçin v. Turkey, no. 2723/07, § 7, 21 April 2009).
• EGMR, 31.01.2012 - 35021/05

  KOVALKOVS v. LATVIA
• EGMR, 30.11.2006 - 61638/00

  IGORS DMITRIJEVS c. LETTONIE

• EGMR, 13.02.2024 - 16760/22

  EXECUTIEF VAN DE MOSLIMS VAN BELGIË ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

  Prendre position à ce sujet serait contraire au principe bien établi dans la jurisprudence de la Cour selon lequel « il n'appartient pas à la Cour d'évaluer la légitimité des revendications religieuses ou de remettre en question la validité ou les mérites relatifs des interprétations qui sont faites d'aspects particuliers des croyances ou des pratiques'(Abdullah Yalçin c. Turquie (no 2), no 34417/10, § 27, 14 juin 2022).
• EGMR, 11.10.2022 - 29443/20

  CONSTANTIN-LUCIAN SPÎNU c. ROUMANIE

  Au vu des éléments qui précèdent, la Cour estime que la décision des autorités pénitentiaires de refuser au requérant l'autorisation d'assister au service religieux de son église à l'extérieur de la prison n'a pas été prise sans que celles-ci n'aient tenu compte de la situation individuelle de l'intéressé (voir, a contrario, Abdullah Yalçin c. Turquie (no 2), no 34417/10, §§ 32-34, 14 juin 2022) et de l'évolution de la crise sanitaire.