Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NAYDYON v. UKRAINE

  Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 34 No violation of Art. 34 Remainder inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (10)

• EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 54547/16

  SHIRKHANYAN v. ARMENIA

  Such an obligation will arise in situations where applicants are particularly vulnerable (see Naydyon v. Ukraine, no. 16474/03, § 63, 14 October 2010; Savitskyy v. Ukraine, no. 38773/05, § 156, 26 July 2012; and Iulian Popescu v. Romania, no. 24999/04, § 33, 4 June 2013).
• EGMR, 14.11.2013 - 29604/12

  KASYMAKHUNOV v. RUSSIA

  Such an obligation will arise in situations where applicants are particularly vulnerable (see Naydyon v. Ukraine, no. 16474/03, § 63, 14 October 2010; Savitskyy v. Ukraine, no. 38773/05, § 156, 26 July 2012; and Iulian Popescu v. Romania, no. 24999/04, § 33, 4 June 2013).
• EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 46404/13

  KHLOYEV v. RUSSIA

  Such an obligation will arise in situations where applicants are particularly vulnerable (see Naydyon v. Ukraine, no. 16474/03, § 63, 14 October 2010; Savitskyy v. Ukraine, no. 38773/05, § 156, 26 July 2012; and Iulian Popescu v. Romania, no. 24999/04, § 33, 4 June 2013).

 
• EGMR, 27.11.2014 - 51857/13

  AMIROV v. RUSSIA

  Such an obligation will arise in situations where applicants are particularly vulnerable (see Naydyon v. Ukraine, no. 16474/03, § 63, 14 October 2010; Savitskyy v. Ukraine, no. 38773/05, § 156, 26 July 2012; and Iulian Popescu v. Romania, no. 24999/04, § 33, 4 June 2013).
• EGMR, 04.06.2019 - 4536/06

  MEHMET ALI AYHAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  An applicant's position might be particularly vulnerable when he is held in custody with limited contact with his family or the outside world (see Cotle?£ v. Romania, no. 38565/97, § 71, 3 June 2003, and Naydyon v. Ukraine, no. 16474/03, § 63, 14 October 2010, with further references).
• EGMR, 23.07.2015 - 12983/14

  PATRANIN v. RUSSIA

  Such an obligation will arise in situations where applicants are particularly vulnerable (see Naydyon v. Ukraine, no. 16474/03, § 63, 14 October 2010; Savitskyy v. Ukraine, no. 38773/05, § 156, 26 July 2012; and Iulian Popescu v. Romania, no. 24999/04, § 33, 4 June 2013).
• EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 54436/14

  KLIMOV v. RUSSIA

  Such an obligation will arise in situations where applicants are particularly vulnerable (see Naydyon v. Ukraine, no. 16474/03, § 63, 14 October 2010; Savitskyy v. Ukraine, no. 38773/05, § 156, 26 July 2012; and Iulian Popescu v. Romania, no. 24999/04, § 33, 4 June 2013).
• EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 59620/14

  YUNUSOVA AND YUNUSOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Such an obligation will arise in situations where applicants are particularly vulnerable (see Naydyon v. Ukraine, no. 16474/03, § 63, 14 October 2010; Savitskyy v. Ukraine, no. 38773/05, § 156, 26 July 2012; and Iulian Popescu v. Romania, no. 24999/04, § 33, 4 June 2013).
• EGMR, 20.02.2018 - 10295/09

  YALUNIN v. UKRAINE

  On 11 January 2011 the Court, having noted that the application raises, in part, an issue of interference with the applicant's right of individual application (Article 34 of the Convention) similar to that in Naydyon v. Ukraine, (no. 16474/03, §§ 68-69, 14 October 2010), decided to give notice of it to the Ukrainian Government ("the Government"), who were lastly represented by their Agent, Mr I. Lishchyna, of the Ministry of Justice.
• EGMR, 01.03.2016 - 66252/14

  ANDREY LAVROV v. RUSSIA

  Such an obligation will arise in situations where applicants are particularly vulnerable (see Naydyon v. Ukraine, no. 16474/03, § 63, 14 October 2010; Savitskyy v. Ukraine, no. 38773/05, § 156, 26 July 2012; and Iulian Popescu v. Romania, no. 24999/04, § 33, 4 June 2013).