Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 26646/07 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,167) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VIRA DOVZHENKO v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
DOVZHENKO v. UKRAINE
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 26646/07
- EGMR, 17.06.2020 - 26646/07
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 24360/04
GIURAN v. ROMANIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 26646/07
Indeed, a violation of the Convention may concern important questions of principle and thus cause a significant disadvantage without affecting pecuniary interests (see, for instance, Giuran v. Romania, no. 24360/04, §§ 22-23, ECHR 2011 (extracts), and Konstantin Stefanov v. Bulgaria, no. 35399/05, §§ 46-47, 27 October 2015). - EGMR, 28.08.2012 - 71407/10
SIMONS c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 26646/07
What is important for the purposes of this provision is that, by using an appropriate domestic remedy, the applicant gives the domestic courts the opportunity to decide first on the complaints under the Convention that he or she intends to raise before the Court (see, for instance, Simons v. Belgium (dec.), no. 71407/10, § 23, 28 August 2012, and Hernaiz-van den Eynden v. Belgium (dec.), no. 618/08, § 19, 7 May 2013). - EGMR, 27.10.2015 - 35399/05
KONSTANTIN STEFANOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 26646/07
Indeed, a violation of the Convention may concern important questions of principle and thus cause a significant disadvantage without affecting pecuniary interests (see, for instance, Giuran v. Romania, no. 24360/04, §§ 22-23, ECHR 2011 (extracts), and Konstantin Stefanov v. Bulgaria, no. 35399/05, §§ 46-47, 27 October 2015). - EGMR, 06.09.2018 - 3401/09
DIMITAR YORDANOV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 26646/07
The above conclusion makes it unnecessary to ascertain whether the interference in question pursued a legitimate aim and whether a fair balance has been struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the applicant's rights (see, Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, §§ 58 and 62, ECHR 1999-II; see also, Dimitar Yordanov v. Bulgaria, no. 3401/09, §§ 63 and 65, 6 September 2018). - EGMR, 07.05.2013 - 618/08
HERNAIZ-VAN DEN EYNDEN c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 26646/07
What is important for the purposes of this provision is that, by using an appropriate domestic remedy, the applicant gives the domestic courts the opportunity to decide first on the complaints under the Convention that he or she intends to raise before the Court (see, for instance, Simons v. Belgium (dec.), no. 71407/10, § 23, 28 August 2012, and Hernaiz-van den Eynden v. Belgium (dec.), no. 618/08, § 19, 7 May 2013).