Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DIMITAR YORDANOV v. BULGARIA

  Remainder inadmissible (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria;(Art. 35-1) Six-month period;No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing);Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  YORDANOV v. BULGARIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 06.09.2018 - 3401/09
• EGMR, 21.10.2020 - 3401/09

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06

  Chodorkowski: Moskauer Prozesse sind unfair

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2018 - 3401/09

  Nevertheless, the Court may entertain a fresh assessment of evidence where the decisions reached by the national courts can be regarded as arbitrary or manifestly unreasonable (see Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos. 11082/06 and 13772/05, §§ 803-4, 25 July 2013, and Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943/11, § 90, ECHR 2016 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 19867/12

  MOREIRA FERREIRA v. PORTUGAL (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2018 - 3401/09

  Thus, issues such as the weight attached by the national courts to given items of evidence or to findings or assessments submitted to them for consideration are not normally for the Court to review (see Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) ([GC], no. 22251/08, § 61, ECHR 2015, and Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867/12, § 83, ECHR 2017 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 05.02.2015 - 22251/08

  BOCHAN v. UKRAINE (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2018 - 3401/09

  Thus, issues such as the weight attached by the national courts to given items of evidence or to findings or assessments submitted to them for consideration are not normally for the Court to review (see Bochan v. Ukraine (no. 2) ([GC], no. 22251/08, § 61, ECHR 2015, and Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no. 2) [GC], no. 19867/12, § 83, ECHR 2017 (extracts)).

 
• EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 35091/02

  MIKHAÏLENKI ET AUTRES c. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2018 - 3401/09

  Of relevance is that it was not engaged in ordinary commercial business, operating instead in a heavily regulated field subject to environmental and health-and-safety requirements (see, mutatis mutandis, Mykhaylenky and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 35091/02 and 9 others, § 45, ECHR 2004-XII).
• EGMR, 09.10.2014 - 39483/05

  LISEYTSEVA AND MASLOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2018 - 3401/09

  For the Court, the fact that that company was a separate legal entity under domestic law (see, for example, Ilieva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 17705/05, § 36, 3 February 2015) cannot be decisive to rule out the State's direct responsibility under the Convention (see Liseytseva and Maslov v. Russia, nos. 39483/05 and 40527/10, § 188, 9 October 2014, and Ali?.ic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 60642/08, § 114, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 21.10.2020 - 17705/05

  ILIEVA ET AUTRES CONTRE LA BULGARIE ET 2 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  Auszug aus EGMR, 06.09.2018 - 3401/09

  For the Court, the fact that that company was a separate legal entity under domestic law (see, for example, Ilieva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 17705/05, § 36, 3 February 2015) cannot be decisive to rule out the State's direct responsibility under the Convention (see Liseytseva and Maslov v. Russia, nos. 39483/05 and 40527/10, § 188, 9 October 2014, and Ali?.ic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 60642/08, § 114, ECHR 2014).

• EGMR, 15.01.2019 - 26646/07

  VIRA DOVZHENKO v. UKRAINE

  The above conclusion makes it unnecessary to ascertain whether the interference in question pursued a legitimate aim and whether a fair balance has been struck between the demands of the general interest of the community and the requirements of the protection of the applicant's rights (see, Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, §§ 58 and 62, ECHR 1999-II; see also, Dimitar Yordanov v. Bulgaria, no. 3401/09, §§ 63 and 65, 6 September 2018).