Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 54710/12 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,16815) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MARKU v. ALBANIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Access to court) (englisch)
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Marku v. Albania
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
MARKU v. ALBANIA
Art. 6 MRK
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 54710/12
- EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 54710/12
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 54710/12
In this way it embodies the "right to a court", of which the right of access, that is, the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, constitutes one aspect (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, §§ 35-36). - EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 9310/81
POWELL ET RAYNER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 54710/12
This right extends only to disputes over "civil rights and obligations" which can be said, at least on arguable grounds, to be recognised under domestic law (see, inter alia, James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98, § 81, and Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, § 36). - EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 8225/78
ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 54710/12
It is subject to limitations, since by its very nature it calls for regulation by the State, which enjoys a certain margin of appreciation in this regard (see Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, § 57). - EGMR, 31.01.1986 - 8734/79
BARTHOLD v. GERMANY (ARTICLE 50)
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 54710/12
This right extends only to disputes over "civil rights and obligations" which can be said, at least on arguable grounds, to be recognised under domestic law (see, inter alia, James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98, § 81, and Powell and Rayner v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1990, Series A no. 172, § 36). - EGMR, 28.04.2009 - 30789/05
FERENC ROZSA AND ISTVAN ROZSA v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2014 - 54710/12
However, the Court reiterates that the Convention and its Protocols must be interpreted as guaranteeing rights which are practical and effective as opposed to theoretical and illusory (see, for example, Ferenc Rózsa and István Rózsa v. Hungary, no. 30789/05, § 22, 28 April 2009).