Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 23665/09 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,54109) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SZCZERBIAK v. POLAND
Art. 10, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 MRK
Struck out of the list (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 25716/94
JANOWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 23665/09
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to freedom of expression (see, for example, Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, ECHR 1999-I; Kwiecien v. Poland, no. 51744/99, 9 January 2007; Frankowicz v. Poland, no. 53025/99, 16 December 2008; Wojtas-Kaleta v. Poland, no. 20436/02, 16 July 2009; Kania and Kittel v. Poland, no. 35105/04, 21 June 2011; Wizerkaniuk v. Poland, no. 18990/05, 5 July 2011). - EGMR, 09.01.2007 - 51744/99
KWIECIEN v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 23665/09
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to freedom of expression (see, for example, Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, ECHR 1999-I; Kwiecien v. Poland, no. 51744/99, 9 January 2007; Frankowicz v. Poland, no. 53025/99, 16 December 2008; Wojtas-Kaleta v. Poland, no. 20436/02, 16 July 2009; Kania and Kittel v. Poland, no. 35105/04, 21 June 2011; Wizerkaniuk v. Poland, no. 18990/05, 5 July 2011). - EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 23665/09
To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI); WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03). - EGMR, 21.06.2011 - 35105/04
KANIA AND KITTEL v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 23665/09
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to freedom of expression (see, for example, Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, ECHR 1999-I; Kwiecien v. Poland, no. 51744/99, 9 January 2007; Frankowicz v. Poland, no. 53025/99, 16 December 2008; Wojtas-Kaleta v. Poland, no. 20436/02, 16 July 2009; Kania and Kittel v. Poland, no. 35105/04, 21 June 2011; Wizerkaniuk v. Poland, no. 18990/05, 5 July 2011).