Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 12786/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
KROWIAK v. POLAND
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96
Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 12786/02
A more detailed rendition of the relevant domestic law provisions is set out in the Court's judgment in Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 75, ECHR 2000-XI, Celejewski v. Poland, no. 17584/04, §§ 22 and 23, 4 May 2006.However, the Court recalls that in order to fall within the scope of Article 3, the alleged treatment must attain a minimum level of severity, the assessment of which depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical or mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim, etc (see, for example, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 91-99, ECHR 2000-XI).
The Court recalls that the general principles regarding the right "to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial", as guaranteed by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, were stated in a number of its previous judgments (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq, ECHR 2000-XI; and McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, §§ 41-44, ECHR 2006-..., with further references).
- EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 17584/04
CELEJEWSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 12786/02
A more detailed rendition of the relevant domestic law provisions is set out in the Court's judgment in Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 75, ECHR 2000-XI, Celejewski v. Poland, no. 17584/04, §§ 22 and 23, 4 May 2006.It does not appear therefore that his case presented particular difficulties for the investigation authorities and for the courts to determine the facts and mount a case against the perpetrator, as would undoubtedly have been the case had the proceedings concerned organised crime (see Celejewski v. Poland, no. 17584/04, § 37, 4 May 2006; Dudek v. Poland, no. 633/03, § 36, 4 May 2006).
The Court recalls that the principles relevant in the present case which emerge from the Court's case law on Article 5 § 4 were stated in a number of its previous judgments (see for instance, Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, judgment of 28 October 1998 and Telecki v. Poland, (dec.), no. 56552/00, 3 July 2003 and Celejewski v. Poland, no. 17584/04, § 47, 4 May 2006; Depa v. Poland, no. 62324/00, § 49, 12 December 2006).
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03
CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 12786/02
The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial proceedings are stated in the Court's decisions in cases of Charzynski v. Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII and the judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V.In particular, it considered that it was capable both of preventing the alleged violation of the right to a hearing within a reasonable time or its continuation, and of providing adequate redress for any violation that has already occurred (see Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-V).
- EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 12786/02
However, even assuming that the applicant had exhausted domestic remedies, the Court reiterates that it is not called upon to deal with errors of fact and law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I).
- EGMR, 26.01.2016 - 35030/14
CÎRNICI c. ROUMANIE
La Cour rappelle ensuite que, dans son arrêt Krowiak c. Pologne (no 12786/02, § 33-34, 16 octobre 2007), elle a jugé que l'impossibilité pour un requérant de bénéficier pendant quelques mois de repas végétariens n'atteignait pas le niveau de gravité requis par l'article 3 de la Convention, eu égard aux exigences pratiques de l'emprisonnement.