Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 51796/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,51428) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 29.09.2005 - 51796/99
- EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 51796/99
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 09.01.2003 - 38822/97
Recht auf Freiheit und Sicherheit (zur Wahrnehmung richterlicher Aufgaben …
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 51796/99
Thus, it appears that the authorities applied the defective approach according to which remand in custody was imposed and maintained automatically whenever the charges concerned a serious offence, without analysis in concreto, which makes this complaint similar to those in previous cases against Bulgaria where violations were found (see, for example, Ilijkov, cited above, §§ 67-87 and Shishkov v. Bulgaria, no. 38822/97, §§ 57-67, ECHR 2003-I). - EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 39084/97
YANKOV c. BULGARIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 51796/99
The relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (the "CCP") and the Bulgarian courts' practice before 1 January 2000 are summarised in the Court's judgments in several similar cases (see, among others, Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, §§ 25-36, ECHR 1999-II; Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, §§ 55-59, 26 July 2001; and Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 79-88, ECHR 2003-XII (extracts)). - EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 11968/86
B. ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 51796/99
From 1 February 2000 to 13 June 2000 (see paragraphs 19, 20 and 34 above), the applicant's deprivation of liberty was based on Article 5 § 1 (a) of the Convention as "the lawful detention of a person after conviction by a competent court" and cannot therefore be taken into account for the purposes of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, a provision which only concerns the length of detention within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention (see, for example, B. v. Austria, judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 175, p. 14, § 36 and Iliev v. Bulgaria, no. 48870/99, § 36, 22 December 2004). - EGMR, 23.11.1999 - 39671/98
M.A. ET M.M. v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 51796/99
In addition, the Court recalls that Article 5 § 4 provides a lex specialis in relation to the more general requirements of Article 13 (see, among other authorities, M.A. and M.M. v. France (dec.), no. 39671/98, ECHR 1999 VIII).