Volltextveröffentlichungen (9)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LJATIFI v. \

  Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens;Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LJATIFI v. \

  [DEU] Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens;Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LJATIFI v. \

  [SLV] Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens;Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

 
• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LJATIFI v. \

  [POR] Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens;Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LJATIFI v. \

  [CZE] Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens;Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LJATIFI v. \

  [MAC] Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens;Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LJATIFI v. \

  [MAC] Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens;Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LJATIFI v. \

  [ALB] Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens;Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LJATIFI v. \

  [HRV] Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 - Procedural safeguards relating to expulsion of aliens;Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  LJATIFI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

  Art. 13, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 4 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 17.05.2018 - 19017/16
• EGMR, 28.08.2019 - 19017/16

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2018 - 19017/16

  In addition, any interpretation of the rights and freedoms guaranteed has to be consistent with "the general spirit of the Convention, an instrument designed to maintain and promote the ideals and values of a democratic society"" (Soering v. the United Kingdom, 7 July 1989, § 87, Series A no. 161) and in the nature of the decision at issue in the present case.
• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 58148/00

  ÉDITIONS PLON c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2018 - 19017/16

  According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to the quantum (see Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 64, ECHR 2004-IV).
• EGMR, 19.06.2012 - 36937/06

  HAJNAL v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2018 - 19017/16

  That is to say, the applicant must have paid them, or be bound to pay them, pursuant to a legal or contractual obligation, and they must have been unavoidable in order to prevent the violation found or to obtain redress (see Belchev v. Bulgaria, no. 39270/98, § 113, 8 April 2004, and Hajnal v. Serbia, no. 36937/06, § 154, 19 June 2012).
• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 39270/98

  BELCHEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2018 - 19017/16

  That is to say, the applicant must have paid them, or be bound to pay them, pursuant to a legal or contractual obligation, and they must have been unavoidable in order to prevent the violation found or to obtain redress (see Belchev v. Bulgaria, no. 39270/98, § 113, 8 April 2004, and Hajnal v. Serbia, no. 36937/06, § 154, 19 June 2012).
• EGMR, 12.10.2006 - 33970/05

  KAYA c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.05.2018 - 19017/16

  Accordingly, they failed to subject the executive's assertion that the applicant posed a national security risk to meaningful scrutiny (see ibid., §§ 43 and 44; Lupsa, cited above, § 41; and Kaya v. Romania, no. 33970/05, § 42, 12 October 2006).

• EGMR - 25828/23 (anhängig)

  FAL c. ESPAGNE

  Le cas échéant, la décision d'expulser le requérant, étranger résidant régulièrement sur le territoire de l'État défendeur, était-elle prise conformément à la loi et aux exigences procédurales de l'article 1 § 1 a), b), c) du Protocole no 7 (voir Muhammad et Muhammad c. Roumanie [GC], no 80982/12, §§ 203-206, 15 octobre 2020 et Ljatifi c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine, no 19017/16, §§ 33-35, 17 mai 2018) ?.