Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 31898/06 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,27799) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TARAN v. UKRAINE
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5+5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 5, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion) Violation of Article 5+5-3 - Right to liberty and ...
Sonstiges (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
Taran v. Ukraine
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
TARAN v. UKRAINE
Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 5, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 31898/06
- EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 31898/06
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96
FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 31898/06
The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities, and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 27.02.2007 - 65559/01
NESTAK v. SLOVAKIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 31898/06
Article 5 § 1 of the Convention requires that for deprivation of liberty to be considered free from arbitrariness, it does not suffice that this measure is executed in conformity with national law; it must also be necessary in the circumstances (see Nesták v. Slovakia, no. 65559/01, § 74, 27 February 2007). - EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 38717/04
KHAYREDINOV v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 31898/06
For the Court, detention pursuant to Article 5 § 1 (c) must embody a proportionality requirement, which implies a reasoned decision balancing relevant arguments for and against release (see Ladent v. Poland, no. 11036/03, § 55, ECHR 2008-... (extracts), and Khayredinov v. Ukraine, no. 38717/04, § 86, 14 October 2010).