Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JENITA MOCANU v. ROMANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings Article 6-1 - Tribunal established by law) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Jenita Mocanu v. Romania

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 11770/08
• EGMR, 19.11.2014 - 11770/08

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 11770/08

  The Court reiterates that the object of the rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies is to allow the national authorities (primarily the judicial authorities) to address allegations made of a violation of a Convention right and, where appropriate, to afford redress before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 38, 28 April 2004, and Kudla v. Poland [GC] no. 30210/96, § 152, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 24.02.1994 - 15450/89

  CASADO COCA v. SPAIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 11770/08

  Reiterating that it is primarily for the national authorities, notably the courts, to resolve problems of interpretation of domestic legislation (see, mutatis mutandis, Edificaciones March Gallego S.A. v. Spain, 19 February 1998, § 33, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, and Casado Coca v. Spain, 24 February 1994, § 43, Series A no. 285-A), the Court notes that the Court of Appeal applied and interpreted the provisions of the former Romanian Code of Civil Procedure when ruling on the admissibility of the applicant's appeal on points of law and it sees no reason, in the absence of any conclusive evidence from the parties to the contrary, to consider that interpretation devoid of merit.
• EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14838/89

  A. v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 11770/08

  Moreover, an applicant who has availed himself of a remedy that is apparently effective and sufficient cannot be required also to have tried others that were available but probably no more likely to be successful (see, mutatis mutandis, A. v. France, 23 November 1993, § 32, Series A no. 277-B).

 
• EGMR, 19.02.1998 - 26102/95

  DALIA v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 11770/08

  The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness; it falls to the respondent State to establish that these various conditions are satisfied (see, inter alia, Vernillo v. France, 20 February 1991, § 27, Series A no. 198, and Dalia v. France, no. 26102/95, § 38, ECHR 1998-I).
• EGMR, 20.07.2006 - 29458/04

  SOKURENKO AND STRYGUN v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 11770/08

  In addition, the phrase "established by law" covers not only the legal basis for the very existence of a "tribunal" but also compliance by the tribunal with the particular rules that govern it (see Sokurenko and Strygun v. Ukraine, nos. 29458/04 and 29465/04, § 24, 20 July 2006) and the composition of the bench in each case (see Buscarini v. San Marino (dec.), no. 31657/96, 4 May 2000, and Posokhov v. Russia, no. 63486/00, § 39, ECHR 2003-IV).
• EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 31657/96

  BUSCARINI contre SAINT-MARIN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 11770/08

  In addition, the phrase "established by law" covers not only the legal basis for the very existence of a "tribunal" but also compliance by the tribunal with the particular rules that govern it (see Sokurenko and Strygun v. Ukraine, nos. 29458/04 and 29465/04, § 24, 20 July 2006) and the composition of the bench in each case (see Buscarini v. San Marino (dec.), no. 31657/96, 4 May 2000, and Posokhov v. Russia, no. 63486/00, § 39, ECHR 2003-IV).
• EKMR, 06.12.1989 - 11879/85

  ROSSI v. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.12.2013 - 11770/08

  The Court reiterates that the phrase "established by law" in Article 6 § 1 also means "established in accordance with law" (see, for instance, Rossi v. France, no. 11879/85, Commission decision of 6 December 1989, Decisions and Reports 63).