Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 18.04.2024 - 51010/13, 2843/16 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2024,7682) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ROMANENKO v. UKRAINE
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ROMANENKO v. UKRAINE
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 18030/11
MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.04.2024 - 51010/13
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION Admissibility 10. The Government claimed that there was no interference with the applicant's rights under Article 10 of the Convention, as three of the four criteria established in Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary ([GC], no. 18030/11, §§ 158-80, 8 November 2016) had not been met; according to them, only the criterion of the "watchdog" role of the applicant had been complied with. - EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 44920/09
Studio Monitori et.al. gegen Georgien
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.04.2024 - 51010/13
Seeing no reason to join this question to the merits (compare Studio Monitori and Others v. Georgia, nos. 44920/09 and 8942/10, § 32, 30 January 2020), the Court will analyse it at the admissibility stage. - EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 10090/16
CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.04.2024 - 51010/13
The Court is also mindful that the domestic legislation did not require that reasons be given for requests for access to public information (see Centre for Democracy and the Rule of Law v. Ukraine, no. 10090/16, § 119, 26 March 2020). - EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 14957/13
VOLODYMYR TORBICH v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.04.2024 - 51010/13
However, it considers that the domestic courts' approach was too formalistic and restrictive as there must have existed, in principle, a possibility of satisfying the applicant's request, for example, by providing the declarations with the personal data redacted in order to preserve the rights of the persons concerned under Article 8 of the Convention (see Volodymyr Torbich v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 14957/13, § 30, 13 July 2023). - EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 18865/11
MIKIASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 18.04.2024 - 51010/13
18865/11 and 51865/11, § 54, 19 January 2021).