Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BRAVO BELO v. PORTUGAL

  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 21.02.1984 - 8544/79

  Öztürk ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 57026/11

  The relative lack of seriousness of the penalty cannot divest an offence of its inherently criminal character (see Öztürk v. Germany, 21 February 1984, § 54, Series A no. 73, and Lutz v. Germany, 25 August 1987, § 55, Series A no. 123).
• EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73

  König ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 57026/11

  The Court recalls that the relevant period to take into account in the assessment of the length of proceedings normally covers the whole of the proceedings in question, including appeal proceedings König v. Germany, 28 June 1978, § 98 in fine, Series A no. 27) and extends right up to the decision which disposes of the dispute (Poiss v. Austria, 23 April 1987, § 50, Series A no. 117).
• EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 47195/06

  MÜLLER-HARTBURG v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 57026/11

  The Court has already held in comparable cases that the disciplinary sanction imposed was not, of itself, such as to render it "criminal" in nature (see, among other authorities, Brown v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 38644/97, ECHR 1998; Vagenas v. Greece (dec.), no. 53372/07, ECHR 2011; and Müller-Hartburg v. Austria, no. 47195/06, §§ 63-64, 19 February 2013).

 
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 57026/11

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 42057/98

  SPEIL v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 57026/11

  In this regard, the Court recalls that it has already accepted that forgoing a hearing may be justified in cases raising merely legal issues of a limited nature (Allan Jacobsson v. Sweden (no. 2), 19 February 1998, §§ 48-49, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I; or which present no particular complexity (see Varela Assalino v. Portugal (dec.), no. 64336/01, ECHR 2002; Speil v. Austria (dec.), no. 42057/98, ECHR 2002).
• EGMR, 25.04.2002 - 64336/01

  VARELA ASSALINO contre le PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 57026/11

  In this regard, the Court recalls that it has already accepted that forgoing a hearing may be justified in cases raising merely legal issues of a limited nature (Allan Jacobsson v. Sweden (no. 2), 19 February 1998, §§ 48-49, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I; or which present no particular complexity (see Varela Assalino v. Portugal (dec.), no. 64336/01, ECHR 2002; Speil v. Austria (dec.), no. 42057/98, ECHR 2002).
• EGMR, 24.11.1998 - 38644/97

  BROWN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 57026/11

  The Court has already held in comparable cases that the disciplinary sanction imposed was not, of itself, such as to render it "criminal" in nature (see, among other authorities, Brown v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 38644/97, ECHR 1998; Vagenas v. Greece (dec.), no. 53372/07, ECHR 2011; and Müller-Hartburg v. Austria, no. 47195/06, §§ 63-64, 19 February 2013).
• EGMR, 23.08.2011 - 53372/07

  VAGENAS c. GRECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 57026/11

  The Court has already held in comparable cases that the disciplinary sanction imposed was not, of itself, such as to render it "criminal" in nature (see, among other authorities, Brown v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 38644/97, ECHR 1998; Vagenas v. Greece (dec.), no. 53372/07, ECHR 2011; and Müller-Hartburg v. Austria, no. 47195/06, §§ 63-64, 19 February 2013).