Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 30461/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
CAGLAYAN v. TURKEY
(englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 30.08.2007 - 30461/02
- EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 30461/02
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96
BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 30461/02
A description of the relevant domestic law at the material time can be found in Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 96-100, 3 June 2004).In the instant case, however, the proceedings in question did not produce any result due to the application of Law no. 4616, which created virtual impunity for the perpetrators of the acts of violence, despite the evidence against them (see, mutatis mutandis, Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 147, ECHR 2004-IV, and Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey, cited above, § 59).
- EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00
KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 30461/02
A description of the relevant domestic law at the material time can be found in Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 96-100, 3 June 2004).In the instant case, however, the proceedings in question did not produce any result due to the application of Law no. 4616, which created virtual impunity for the perpetrators of the acts of violence, despite the evidence against them (see, mutatis mutandis, Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 147, ECHR 2004-IV, and Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey, cited above, § 59).
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 30461/02
Failing this, a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Çolak and Filizer v. Turkey, nos. 32578/96 and 32579/96, § 30, 8 January 2004; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V; Aksoy, cited above, § 61; and Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 34).
- EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93
Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 30461/02
Indeed, the burden of proof may be regarded as resting on the authorities to provide a satisfactory and convincing explanation (see Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 30461/02
Failing this, a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Çolak and Filizer v. Turkey, nos. 32578/96 and 32579/96, § 30, 8 January 2004; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V; Aksoy, cited above, § 61; and Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 34). - EGMR, 17.10.2006 - 52067/99
OKKALI c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 30461/02
Consequently, the Court considers that the criminal-law system, as applied in the applicant's case, has proved to be far from rigorous and has had no dissuasive effect capable of ensuring the effective prevention of unlawful acts such as those complained of by the applicant (see, mutatis mutandis, Okkalı v. Turkey, no. 52067/99, § 78, ECHR 2006-...). - EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94
AVSAR c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 30461/02
The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human rights requires that these provisions be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 390, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts)). - EGMR, 08.01.2004 - 32578/96
Folterverbot; unmenschliche Behandlung (Anwendung auf den Terrorismus: PKK; …
Auszug aus EGMR, 21.10.2008 - 30461/02
Failing this, a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Çolak and Filizer v. Turkey, nos. 32578/96 and 32579/96, § 30, 8 January 2004; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V; Aksoy, cited above, § 61; and Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 34).