Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SIMON v. UKRAINE

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture;Degrading treatment) ...

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 28.03.2006 - 72286/01

  MELNIK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 41877/21

  The Court has already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, §§ 103-05, ECHR 2005 II, Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 104-06, 28 March 2006 and Logvinenko v. Ukraine, no. 13448/07, §§ 68-78, 14 October 2010).

  - (see Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 113-16, 28 March 2006; Logvinenko v. Ukraine, no. 13448/07,.

• EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 13448/07

  LOGVINENKO v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 41877/21

  The Court has already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, §§ 103-05, ECHR 2005 II, Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 104-06, 28 March 2006 and Logvinenko v. Ukraine, no. 13448/07, §§ 68-78, 14 October 2010).

  - (see Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 113-16, 28 March 2006; Logvinenko v. Ukraine, no. 13448/07,.

• EuGH, 09.02.2006 - C-23/04

  Sfakianakis - Assoziierungsabkommen EWG-Ungarn - Verpflichtung der Zollbehörden, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 41877/21

  25/04/2019.

 
• EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 17564/06

  SADRETDINOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 41877/21

  Nevertheless, this does not mean that each detainee must be guaranteed the same level of medical treatment that is available in the best health establishments outside prison facilities (see, for instance, Sadretdinov v. Russia, no. 17564/06, § 67, 24 May 2016, with further references and Konovalchuk v. Ukraine, no. 31928/15, § 52, 13 October 2016, with further references).
• EGMR, 06.03.2014 - 31535/09

  GORBULYA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 41877/21

  It has clarified in this context that the authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see, for example, Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, § 62, 6 March 2014, with further references and Pokhlebin v. Ukraine, no. 35581/06, § 62, 20 May 2010, with further references) and that - where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition - supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy aimed at successfully treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see, inter alia, Ukhan v. Ukraine, no. 30628/02, § 74, 18 December 2008, with further references and Kolesnikovich v. Russia, no. 44694/13, § 70, 22 March 2016, with further references).
• EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 35581/06

  POKHLEBIN v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 41877/21

  It has clarified in this context that the authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see, for example, Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, § 62, 6 March 2014, with further references and Pokhlebin v. Ukraine, no. 35581/06, § 62, 20 May 2010, with further references) and that - where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition - supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy aimed at successfully treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see, inter alia, Ukhan v. Ukraine, no. 30628/02, § 74, 18 December 2008, with further references and Kolesnikovich v. Russia, no. 44694/13, § 70, 22 March 2016, with further references).
• EGMR, 22.03.2016 - 44694/13

  KOLESNIKOVICH v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 41877/21

  It has clarified in this context that the authorities must ensure that diagnosis and care are prompt and accurate (see, for example, Gorbulya v. Russia, no. 31535/09, § 62, 6 March 2014, with further references and Pokhlebin v. Ukraine, no. 35581/06, § 62, 20 May 2010, with further references) and that - where necessitated by the nature of a medical condition - supervision is regular and systematic and involves a comprehensive therapeutic strategy aimed at successfully treating the detainee's health problems or preventing their aggravation (see, inter alia, Ukhan v. Ukraine, no. 30628/02, § 74, 18 December 2008, with further references and Kolesnikovich v. Russia, no. 44694/13, § 70, 22 March 2016, with further references).
• EGMR, 13.10.2016 - 31928/15

  KONOVALCHUK v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.02.2024 - 41877/21

  Nevertheless, this does not mean that each detainee must be guaranteed the same level of medical treatment that is available in the best health establishments outside prison facilities (see, for instance, Sadretdinov v. Russia, no. 17564/06, § 67, 24 May 2016, with further references and Konovalchuk v. Ukraine, no. 31928/15, § 52, 13 October 2016, with further references).