Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KULYK v. UKRAINE

  No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 30760/06

  It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances or the victim's behaviour (see, among other authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 24.07.2001 - 44558/98

  VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 30760/06

  The assessment of this minimum level of severity is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the gender, age and state of health of the victim (see Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII).
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 30760/06

  It is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of the cause of such injuries, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, §§ 108-111, Series A no. 241-A; Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no. 336).

 
• EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87

  TOMASI c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 30760/06

  It is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of the cause of such injuries, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Tomasi v. France, 27 August 1992, §§ 108-111, Series A no. 241-A; Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 34, Series A no. 336).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

  McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 30760/06

  The Court is sensitive to the subsidiary nature of its role and recognises that it must be cautious in taking on the role of a first-instance tribunal of fact, where this is not rendered unavoidable by the circumstances of a particular case (see, for example, McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000).
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 30760/06

  A prompt response by the authorities in the investigation of a case of ill-treatment may generally be regarded as essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 136, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

  AVSAR c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 30760/06

  Nevertheless, when allegations are made under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court must apply a particularly thorough scrutiny, even if certain domestic proceedings and investigations have already taken place (see, Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 283, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts); Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310/04, § 148, 21 April 2011).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 30760/06

  A prompt response by the authorities in the investigation of a case of ill-treatment may generally be regarded as essential in maintaining public confidence in their adherence to the rule of law and preventing any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 136, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 29.04.2003 - 38812/97

  POLTORATSKIY v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 30760/06

  In order to accomplish the necessary steps, the collection and securing of evidence should also be done promptly (see Poltoratskiy v. Ukraine, no. 38812/97, § 126, ECHR 2003-V).
• EGMR, 21.04.2011 - 42310/04

  NECHIPORUK AND YONKALO v. UKRAINE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.06.2016 - 30760/06

  Nevertheless, when allegations are made under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court must apply a particularly thorough scrutiny, even if certain domestic proceedings and investigations have already taken place (see, Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 283, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts); Nechiporuk and Yonkalo v. Ukraine, no. 42310/04, § 148, 21 April 2011).

• EGMR, 09.11.2017 - 47274/15

  Konflikt zwischen Polizei und Fans ungenügend untersucht

  Besonders erwähnenswert ist in diesem Zusammenhang die Rechtssache Kulyk./. Ukraine (Individualbeschwerde Nr. 30760/06, Rdnr. 107, 23. Juni 2016).
• EGMR, 21.03.2024 - 26815/16

  PETRAKOVSKYY AND LEONTYEV v. Ukraine v. UKRAINE

  (i) First medical examinations conducted two days after the applicant's release; no conclusive evidence indicating that injuries were sustained under police control (for relevant examples, see Kulyk v. Ukraine, no. 30760/06, §§ 82-83, 23 June 2016, and Barysheva v. Ukraine, no. 9505/12, §§ 55-56, 14 March 2017).
• EGMR, 20.01.2022 - 59333/16

  EDZGVERADZE v. GEORGIA

  In this connection, the Court reiterates the authorities' obligation to make a serious attempt to find out what happened, including by taking all reasonable steps to secure the evidence concerning the incident (see, among other authorities, cited above, § 174, and Kulyk v. Ukraine, no. 30760/06, § 100, 23 June 2016).
• EGMR, 02.02.2017 - 34515/04

  KULIK v. UKRAINE

  The assessment of this minimum level of severity is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case in question, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see, among other authorities, Ireland v. the United Kingdom, cited above, § 162, and Kulyk v. Ukraine, no. 30760/06, § 77, 23 June 2016).