Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 42780/98 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,30325) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
I.H., Me.H., R.H. and Mu.H. v. AUSTRIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 2 MRK
Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 42780/98
- EGMR, 06.05.2003 - 42780/98
- EGMR, 20.04.2006 - 42780/98
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 02.03.1987 - 9562/81
MONNELL ET MORRIS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 42780/98
Thus proceedings for leave to appeal or proceedings involving only questions of law, as opposed to questions of fact, may comply with the requirements of Article 6 even where the appellant was not given an opportunity of being heard in person by the appeal or cassation court (Monnell and Morris v. the United Kingdom judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 115, p. 22, § 58). - EGMR, 19.07.1995 - 17506/90
KEROJÄRVI v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 42780/98
The Court recalls that the manner of application of Article 6 to proceedings before appellate courts depends on the special features of the proceedings involved; account must be taken of the entirety of the proceedings in the domestic legal order and of the role of the appellate court therein (Kerojärvi v. Finland judgment of 19 July 1995, Series A no. 322, p. 15, § 40). - EGMR, 18.01.2000 - 27618/95
PESTI AND FRODL v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 23.10.2001 - 42780/98
In several Member States of the Council of Europe such a review is limited to questions of law or may require the person wishing to appeal to apply for leave to do so (Pesti and Frodl v. Austria (dec.), 27618/95 and 27619/95, 18.1.2000).