Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  VERDES v. ROMANIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  VERDES v. ROMANIA

  Art. 3, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

  Das Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung gemäß Art. 6 Abs. 1 S. 1 EMRK in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 6215/14

  The Court reiterates that under Article 3, the State must ensure that a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for his human dignity, that the manner and method of execution of the measure of detention do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Bahna, cited above, § 43; Enasoaie, cited above, § 46; and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

  Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 6215/14

  When assessing conditions of detention, account has to be taken of the cumulative effects of these conditions, as well as of specific allegations made by the applicant (see Bahna, cited above, § 44, and Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II).

• EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 80529/13

  EZE v. ROMANIA

  The Court reiterates that, under Article 3, the State must ensure that: a person is detained in conditions which are compatible with respect for his human dignity; the manner and method of execution of the measure of detention do not subject him to distress or hardship of an intensity exceeding the unavoidable level of suffering inherent in detention; and that, given the practical demands of imprisonment, his health and well-being are adequately secured (see Verdes v. Romania, no. 6215/14, § 73, 24 November 2015, and Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI).
• EGMR, 01.10.2019 - 46797/16

  CIOCOIU c. ROUMANIE

  Le droit et la pratique interne pertinent 14. Le droit interne pertinent, y compris le recours auprès du juge de surveillance de l'exécution des peines, est décrit dans les affaires Rezmives et autres c. Roumanie (nos 61467/12 et 3 autres, §§ 26-35, 25 avril 2017) et Verdes c. Roumanie (no 6215/14, § 36, 24 novembre 2015).
• EGMR, 02.11.2021 - 43393/18

  BUJOR c. ROUMANIE

  LE DROIT INTERNE 32. Le droit interne pertinent, y compris le recours auprès du juge de la surveillance de l'exécution des peines, est décrit dans les affaires Rezmives et autres c. Roumanie (nos 61467/12 et 3 autres, §§ 26-35, 25 avril 2017) et Verdes c. Roumanie (no 6215/14, § 36, 24 novembre 2015).