Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LIEPINS v. LATVIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing Equality of arms) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82

  KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 31855/03

  Neither did he claim that issues going to his personality or character were concerned (see Kamasinski v. Austria, 19 December 1989, §§ 106 and 107, Series A no. 168).
• EGMR, 07.06.2001 - 39594/98

  KRESS c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 31855/03

  In the case at hand the element of attendance has a direct bearing on the principle of equality of arms, which requires that each party be given a reasonable opportunity to present his or her case under conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see Kress v. France [GC], no. 39594/98, § 72, ECHR 2001-VI).
• EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12350/86

  KREMZOW v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 31855/03

  In support of that argument, the Government referred to Kremzow v. Austria (21 September 1993, §§ 58-64, Series A no. 268-B).

 
• EGMR, 22.02.1984 - 8209/78

  Sutter ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 31855/03

  The Court observes at the outset that proceedings involving only questions of law, as opposed to questions of fact, may comply with the requirements of Article 6 even where the appellant was not given the opportunity of being heard in person by the cassation court, provided that he was heard by a first-instance court (see, among other authorities, Hermi v. Italy, cited above, § 61, and Sutter v. Switzerland, 22 February 1984, § 30, Series A no. 74, as regards courts of cassation).
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 31365/96

  VARBANOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 31855/03

  The Court reiterates that, whilst the use of offensive language in proceedings before it is undoubtedly inappropriate, an application may only be rejected as abusive in extraordinary circumstances (see, for example, Felbab v. Serbia, no. 14011/07, § 56, 14 April 2009, and Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X).
• EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 61164/00

  DURINGER et AUTRES et GRUNGE contre la FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 31855/03

  61164/00 and 18589/02, 4 February 2003; Manoussos v. the Czech Republic and Germany (dec.), no. 46468/99, 9 July 2002; and Stamoulakatos v. the United Kingdom, no. 27567/95, Commission decision of 9 April 1997).
• EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 46468/99

  MANOUSSOS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 31855/03

  61164/00 and 18589/02, 4 February 2003; Manoussos v. the Czech Republic and Germany (dec.), no. 46468/99, 9 July 2002; and Stamoulakatos v. the United Kingdom, no. 27567/95, Commission decision of 9 April 1997).
• EGMR, 14.04.2009 - 14011/07

  FELBAB v. SERBIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 31855/03

  The Court reiterates that, whilst the use of offensive language in proceedings before it is undoubtedly inappropriate, an application may only be rejected as abusive in extraordinary circumstances (see, for example, Felbab v. Serbia, no. 14011/07, § 56, 14 April 2009, and Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X).

• EGMR, 17.12.2015 - 15102/10

  SOBKO v. UKRAINE

  In the case at hand, the element of attendance has a direct bearing on the principle of equality of arms, which requires that each party be given a reasonable opportunity to present his or her case in conditions that do not place him at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis his opponent (see Kress v. France [GC], no. 39594/98, § 72, ECHR 2001-VI, and Liepins v. Latvia, no. 31855/03, § 48, 25 November 2014).