Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.03.2002 - 47227/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,45891) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
BAKOVA v. SLOVAKIA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Partly admissible Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 26.03.2002 - 47227/99
- EGMR, 12.11.2002 - 47227/99
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 23.11.1983 - 8919/80
VAN DER MUSSELE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2002 - 47227/99
The Court recalls that Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 applies only to existing possessions and does not guarantee a right to acquire property (see, e.g., Van der Mussele v. Belgium judgment of 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, p. 23, § 48). - EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 30544/96
GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAIN
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2002 - 47227/99
It is not its function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they may have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention (see Garcia Ruiz v. Spain, no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I). - EGMR, 12.07.2001 - 33071/96
MALHOUS c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2002 - 47227/99
In accordance with the Court's practice, a conditional claim which lapses as a result of the non-fulfilment of a statutory condition cannot be considered as a "possession" within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, e.g., Malhous v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 33071/96, 13.12.2000, to be reported in ECHR 2000-XII).