Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 28841/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,5777) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DE CICCO v. ITALY
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 75529/01
Verschleppter Prozess - Mann prozessiert seit 16 Jahren um Entschädigung nach …
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 28841/03
The effect of Article 13 is thus to require the provision of a domestic remedy to deal with the substance of an "arguable complaint" under the Convention and to grant appropriate relief in meritorious cases (see Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 17, ECHR 2002-VIII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 186-88, ECHR 2006-V; and Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 98, ECHR 2006-VII). - EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 23563/07
GAGLIANO GIORGI c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 28841/03
The Court further refers to its settled case-law to the effect that the inadequacy of compensation awarded under "Pinto" proceedings is not sufficient grounds to call into question the overall effectiveness of this remedy (see Gagliano Giorgi v. Italy, no. 23563/07, § 79, ECHR 2012 (extracts), and Delle Cave and Corrado v. Italy, cited above, §§ 43-46). - EGMR, 11.09.2002 - 57220/00
MIFSUD contre la FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 26.03.2020 - 28841/03
The effect of Article 13 is thus to require the provision of a domestic remedy to deal with the substance of an "arguable complaint" under the Convention and to grant appropriate relief in meritorious cases (see Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 17, ECHR 2002-VIII; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 186-88, ECHR 2006-V; and Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 98, ECHR 2006-VII).