Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  EMILIAN-GEORGE IGNA v. ROMANIA

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 4 MRK
  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Review of lawfulness of detention) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Emilian-George Igna v. Romania

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 30.03.1989 - 10444/83

  LAMY c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 21249/05

  Equality of arms is not ensured if counsel is denied access to those documents in the investigation file which are essential in order effectively to challenge the lawfulness of his client's detention (see Lamy v. Belgium, 30 March 1989, § 29, Series A no. 151, and Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 58, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 23541/94

  Recht auf Akteneinsicht bei der Haftprüfung (wesentliche Verfahrensakten; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 21249/05

  The Court reiterates that in view of the dramatic impact of deprivation of liberty on the fundamental rights of the person concerned, proceedings conducted under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention should in principle also meet, to the largest extent possible under the circumstances of an on-going investigation, the basic requirements of a fair trial as guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention (see, inter alia, Schöps v. Germany, no. 25116/94, § 44, ECHR 2001-I; Garcia Alva v. Germany, no. 23541/94, § 39, 13 February 2001; and Svipsta v. Latvia, no. 66820/01, § 129, ECHR 2006-III (extracts)).
• EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 25116/94

  Recht auf Akteneinsicht bei der Haftprüfung (nicht nur auszugsweise Einsicht in …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 21249/05

  The Court reiterates that in view of the dramatic impact of deprivation of liberty on the fundamental rights of the person concerned, proceedings conducted under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention should in principle also meet, to the largest extent possible under the circumstances of an on-going investigation, the basic requirements of a fair trial as guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention (see, inter alia, Schöps v. Germany, no. 25116/94, § 44, ECHR 2001-I; Garcia Alva v. Germany, no. 23541/94, § 39, 13 February 2001; and Svipsta v. Latvia, no. 66820/01, § 129, ECHR 2006-III (extracts)).
• EGMR, 09.03.2006 - 66820/01

  SVIPSTA c. LETTONIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.11.2013 - 21249/05

  The Court reiterates that in view of the dramatic impact of deprivation of liberty on the fundamental rights of the person concerned, proceedings conducted under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention should in principle also meet, to the largest extent possible under the circumstances of an on-going investigation, the basic requirements of a fair trial as guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention (see, inter alia, Schöps v. Germany, no. 25116/94, § 44, ECHR 2001-I; Garcia Alva v. Germany, no. 23541/94, § 39, 13 February 2001; and Svipsta v. Latvia, no. 66820/01, § 129, ECHR 2006-III (extracts)).

• EGMR, 09.04.2015 - 30460/13

  A.T. c. LUXEMBOURG

  Par ailleurs, se référant notamment à l'arrêt Emilian-George Igna c. Roumanie (no 21249/05, 26 novembre 2013), il souligne que le premier interrogatoire peut aboutir à la détention provisoire de l'inculpé.

  L'intéressé ne saurait donc utilement invoquer l'affaire Emilian-George Igna c. Roumanie (no 21249/05, 26 novembre 2013), qui traite d'une question de nature différente, celle de la légalité de la détention sous l'angle de l'article 5 § 4 de la Convention.