Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 2508/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2019,13513) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GÜZEL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Partly struck out of the list;Partly inadmissible (englisch)
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03
SULWINSKA v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 2508/05
To this end, the Court has examined the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey (preliminary objections) [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Sp. z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03, 18 September 2007). - EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 73065/01
BULUT and YAVUZ v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.04.2019 - 2508/05
If, as the applicant alleges, he did not become aware of this situation for eight years, that was due to their own negligence(see Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09 and 2 others, § 263, ECHR 2014 (extracts); see also Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002).