Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 1262/02 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,67943) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DOGRUSÖZ AND ASLAN v. TURKEY
Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of P1-1 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 28.06.2005 - 1262/02
- EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 1262/02
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80
LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 1262/02
The protection of the right to property afforded by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 would be largely illusory and ineffective in the absence of any equivalent principle (Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, § 128). - EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75
SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 1262/02
Since the Convention is intended to guarantee rights that are "practical and effective", it has to be ascertained whether the situation amounted to a de facto expropriation (see the Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, pp. 24-25, § 63).
- EGMR, 14.04.2009 - 19467/07
KARAKUS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 1250/02
TUNCAY v. TURKEY
It therefore deems it appropriate to fix a lump sum that would correspond to the applicant's legitimate expectations of obtaining compensation (Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 254-259, ECHR 2006-..., Stornaiuolo v. Italy, no. 52980/99, §§ 82-91, 8 August 2006, and DoÄ?rusöz and Aslan v. Turkey, no. 1262/02, § 36, 30 May 2006).