Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MONTANARO GAUCI AND OTHERS v. MALTA

  Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MONTANARO GAUCI AND OTHERS v. MALTA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 31454/12
• EGMR, 10.10.2017 - 31454/12

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

• EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 31122/05

  GHIGO v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 31454/12

  This was in line with the findings of the European Court of Human Rights in similar circumstances, in the cases of Ghigo v. Malta (no. 31122/05, 26 September 2006) and Fleri Soler and Camilleri v. Malta (no. 35349/05, ECHR 2006-X).

  When including non-pecuniary damage, such awards had amounted to, for example, EUR 1, 168 and EUR 1, 400 respectively, in Edwards v. Malta (just satisfaction), no. 17647/04, § 22, 24, and 37, 17 July 2008), and Ghigo v. Malta (just satisfaction), no. 31122/05, §§ 19, 21 and 32, 17 July 2008).

  As to the applicable rent, the Court takes note of the efforts made by the Government to make changes to the legislation (in the form, inter alia, of the 2010 amendments) in the wake of the execution phase before the Committee of Ministers in connection with a series of judgments delivered against Malta concerning this subject matter (see Ghigo v. Malta, no. 31122/05, 26 September 2006; Edwards v. Malta, no. 17647/04, 24 October 2006; and Fleri Soler and Camilleri, cited above).

• EGMR, 26.09.2006 - 35349/05

  FLERI SOLER ET CAMILLERI c. MALTE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 31454/12

  This was in line with the findings of the European Court of Human Rights in similar circumstances, in the cases of Ghigo v. Malta (no. 31122/05, 26 September 2006) and Fleri Soler and Camilleri v. Malta (no. 35349/05, ECHR 2006-X).

  They referred to, inter alia, Fleri Soler and Camilleri v. Malta (no. 35349/05, ECHR 2006-X).

• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 31454/12

  The purpose of this rule is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, among other authorities, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V).

 
• EGMR, 21.02.1990 - 11855/85

  H?KANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 31454/12

  However, such a waiver must be made in an unequivocal manner and must not run counter to any important public interest (see, for example, Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, § 66, and Dorozhko and Pozhaskiy v. Estonia, nos. 14659/04 and 16855/04, § 46, 24 April 2008).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 31454/12

  Furthermore, subject to monitoring by the Committee of Ministers, the respondent State remains free to choose the means by which it will discharge its legal obligation under Article 46 of the Convention, provided that such means are compatible with the conclusions set out in the Court's judgment (see, mutatis mutandis, Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 248, ECHR 2000-VIII).
• EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 18766/11

  Italien muß Rechtsrahmen für gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaft schaffen

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 31454/12

  Whether the redress given is effective will depend, among other things, on the nature of the right alleged to have been breached, the reasons given for the decision and the persistence of the unfavourable consequences for the person concerned after that decision (see Oliari and Others v. Italy, nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11, § 78, 21 July 2015).
• EGMR, 14.10.2014 - 31102/06

  PAPLAUSKIENE v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 31454/12

  Whether an individual has victim status may also depend on the amount of compensation awarded by the domestic courts and the effectiveness (including the promptness) of the remedy affording the award (see Paplauskiene v. Lithuania, no. 31102/06, § 51, 14 October 2014).