Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 12101/03 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,71895) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
DURMUS KURT AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Art. 3, Art. 13 MRK
Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 13 (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 23.05.2006 - 12101/03
- EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 12101/03
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00
KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 12101/03
A full description of the domestic law may be found in the judgment of Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 95-98, ECHR 2004-IV). - EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96
BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 12101/03
A full description of the domestic law may be found in the judgment of Batı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 95-98, ECHR 2004-IV). - EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91
RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 12101/03
The Court reiterates that where an individual is taken into custody in good health but is found to be injured by the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused and to produce evidence casting doubt on the victim's allegations, particularly if those allegations were corroborated by medical reports, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V; Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI, p. 2278, § 62; Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, pp. 40-41, §§ 108-111; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 34). - EGMR, 27.08.1992 - 12850/87
TOMASI c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 31.05.2007 - 12101/03
The Court reiterates that where an individual is taken into custody in good health but is found to be injured by the time of release, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused and to produce evidence casting doubt on the victim's allegations, particularly if those allegations were corroborated by medical reports, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V; Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI, p. 2278, § 62; Tomasi v. France, judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, pp. 40-41, §§ 108-111; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 34).