Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 19433/07   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2012,27176
EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 19433/07 (https://dejure.org/2012,27176)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 31.07.2012 - 19433/07 (https://dejure.org/2012,27176)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 31. Juli 2012 - 19433/07 (https://dejure.org/2012,27176)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,27176) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    TYAGUNOVA v. RUSSIA

    Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
    Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 18.10.2001 - 31143/96

    INDELICATO c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 19433/07
    Consideration has been given to the opening of investigations, delays in taking statements (see Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 89, ECHR 2000-VI, and Tekin v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, § 67, Reports 1998-IV) and to the length of time taken for the initial investigation (see Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

    M.C. c. BULGARIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 19433/07
    The general principles concerning the existence of a positive obligation to punish rape and to investigate rape cases can be summarised as follows (see M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, ECHR 2003-XII):.
  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 19433/07
    In cases under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention where the effectiveness of the official investigation has been at issue, the Court has often assessed whether the authorities reacted promptly to the complaints at the relevant time (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §§ 133 et seq., ECHR 2000-IV).
  • EGMR, 26.01.2006 - 77617/01

    MIKHEYEV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 19433/07
    Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of injuries or the identity of the persons responsible will risk falling foul of this standard, and a requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition is implicit in this context (see, among many authorities, Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, 107 et seq., 26 January 2006, and Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, §§ 102 et seq.).
  • EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

    CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 19433/07
    Such a positive obligation cannot be considered in principle to be limited solely to cases of ill-treatment by State agents (see, mutatis mutandis, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, ECHR 2002-I).
  • EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

    TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 19433/07
    Consideration has been given to the opening of investigations, delays in taking statements (see Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 89, ECHR 2000-VI, and Tekin v. Turkey, 9 June 1998, § 67, Reports 1998-IV) and to the length of time taken for the initial investigation (see Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 20325/06

    MITYAGINY v. RUSSIA

    Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of injuries or the identity of the persons responsible will risk falling foul of this standard, and a requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition is implicit in this context (see, as a recent example, Tyagunova v. Russia, no. 19433/07, § 65, 31 July 2012).
  • EGMR, 17.05.2016 - 8049/07

    NEKRASOV v. RUSSIA

    Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of injuries or the identity of the persons responsible will risk falling foul of this standard, and a requirement of promptness and reasonable expedition is implicit in this context (see Tyagunova v. Russia, no. 19433/07, § 65, 31 July 2012).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht