Auszug aus EGMR - 1097/10

- Did the domestic courts adduce "relevant and sufficient" reasons for the interference and base their conclusions on an acceptable assessment of the facts (see, as regards the applicable principles, Perinçek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510/08, §§ 204-08 and §§ 212-20, ECHR 2015 (extracts) as regards pertinent factors, and Terentyev v. Russia, no. 25147/09, §§ 20-24, 26 January 2017 as regards the approach)? Did they specify which parts of the impugned materials were problematic? Did they draw their own conclusions from the linguistic studies of the material (see paragraph 23 of the Plenary Supreme Court's ruling no. 11 of 28 June 2011)?.