Rechtsprechung
   EGMR - 13455/23   

Anhängiges Verfahren
Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/9999,151527
EGMR - 13455/23 (https://dejure.org/9999,151527)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/9999,151527) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 22774/93

    IMMOBILIARE SAFFI v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR - 13455/23
    Were the applicant's right of access to court protected under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and his right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention violated as a result of the impossibility to seize the assets of his employer to enforce a court judgment (Çakir and Others v. Turkey, no. 25747/09, §§ 15-26, 4 June 2013; Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2006-XIV; Lunari v. Italy, no. 21463/93, §§ 42 and 45, 11 January 2001; and Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-V)?.
  • EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 25747/09

    ÇAKIR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR - 13455/23
    Were the applicant's right of access to court protected under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and his right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention violated as a result of the impossibility to seize the assets of his employer to enforce a court judgment (Çakir and Others v. Turkey, no. 25747/09, §§ 15-26, 4 June 2013; Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2006-XIV; Lunari v. Italy, no. 21463/93, §§ 42 and 45, 11 January 2001; and Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-V)?.
  • EGMR, 11.01.2001 - 21463/93

    LUNARI c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR - 13455/23
    Were the applicant's right of access to court protected under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and his right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention violated as a result of the impossibility to seize the assets of his employer to enforce a court judgment (Çakir and Others v. Turkey, no. 25747/09, §§ 15-26, 4 June 2013; Apostol v. Georgia, no. 40765/02, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2006-XIV; Lunari v. Italy, no. 21463/93, §§ 42 and 45, 11 January 2001; and Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-V)?.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht