Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 23906/15 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
ODARENKO v. UKRAINE
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 23893/03
KAVERZIN v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR - 23906/15
Have the domestic authorities conducted an effective official investigation into the applicant's alleged ill-treatment, as required by Article 3 of the Convention (see, for both questions, Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 81-90 and 114-23, ECHR 2015; Teslenko v. Ukraine, no. 55528/08, §§ 87-90 and 106-18, 20 December 2011; Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893/03, §§ 173-80, 15 May 2012; and Sadkov v. Ukraine, no. 21987/05, §§ 91-101, 6 July 2017)?. - EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 55528/08
TESLENKO v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR - 23906/15
Have the domestic authorities conducted an effective official investigation into the applicant's alleged ill-treatment, as required by Article 3 of the Convention (see, for both questions, Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 81-90 and 114-23, ECHR 2015; Teslenko v. Ukraine, no. 55528/08, §§ 87-90 and 106-18, 20 December 2011; Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893/03, §§ 173-80, 15 May 2012; and Sadkov v. Ukraine, no. 21987/05, §§ 91-101, 6 July 2017)?. - EGMR, 06.07.2017 - 21987/05
SADKOV v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR - 23906/15
Have the domestic authorities conducted an effective official investigation into the applicant's alleged ill-treatment, as required by Article 3 of the Convention (see, for both questions, Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 81-90 and 114-23, ECHR 2015; Teslenko v. Ukraine, no. 55528/08, §§ 87-90 and 106-18, 20 December 2011; Kaverzin v. Ukraine, no. 23893/03, §§ 173-80, 15 May 2012; and Sadkov v. Ukraine, no. 21987/05, §§ 91-101, 6 July 2017)?. - EGMR, 15.11.2012 - 30075/06
ZAMFERESKO v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR - 23906/15
Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against her, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the fairness of her trial undermined by the admission as evidence of her statements allegedly obtained in breach of her rights under Article 3 of the Convention (see, for example, Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010; Zamferesko v. Ukraine, no. 30075/06, §§ 70-72, 15 November 2012; and Zyakun v. Ukraine, no. 34006/06, §§ 62-64, 25 February 2016)?. - EGMR, 25.02.2016 - 34006/06
ZYAKUN v. UKRAINE
Auszug aus EGMR - 23906/15
Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against her, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the fairness of her trial undermined by the admission as evidence of her statements allegedly obtained in breach of her rights under Article 3 of the Convention (see, for example, Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 166, ECHR 2010; Zamferesko v. Ukraine, no. 30075/06, §§ 70-72, 15 November 2012; and Zyakun v. Ukraine, no. 34006/06, §§ 62-64, 25 February 2016)?.