Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 35054/22 |
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
GÖRGEL v. TÜRKIYE
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (2)
- EGMR, 17.11.2020 - 59453/10
SÜLEYMAN v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR - 35054/22
The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicant on account of his inability to examine witness B.T. in person before the trial court (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, ECHR 2011; Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, ECHR 2015; Ürek and Ürek v. Turkey, no. 74845/12, 30 July 2019, and Süleyman v. Turkey no. 59453/10, 17 November 2020).a) Was the applicant able to examine the witness against him (namely, B.T.), as required by Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, ECHR 2011; Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, ECHR 2015; Ürek and Ürek v. Turkey, no. 74845/12, 30 July 2019, and Süleyman v. Turkey, no. 59453/10, 17 November 2020)?.
- EGMR, 30.07.2019 - 74845/12
ÜREK AND ÜREK v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR - 35054/22
The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicant on account of his inability to examine witness B.T. in person before the trial court (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, ECHR 2011; Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, ECHR 2015; Ürek and Ürek v. Turkey, no. 74845/12, 30 July 2019, and Süleyman v. Turkey no. 59453/10, 17 November 2020).a) Was the applicant able to examine the witness against him (namely, B.T.), as required by Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, ECHR 2011; Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, ECHR 2015; Ürek and Ürek v. Turkey, no. 74845/12, 30 July 2019, and Süleyman v. Turkey, no. 59453/10, 17 November 2020)?.