Rechtsprechung
| EGMR - 77427/14 |
Anhängiges Verfahren
Sonstiges
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (5)
- EGMR, 25.09.2001 - 44787/98
P.G. AND J.H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR - 77427/14
Was the applicant afforded sufficient procedural safeguards in the relevant proceedings (see, in the context of Article 8 of the Convention, Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 84, ECHR 2000-XI; Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I; P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-IX; Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963/99, § 123, 20 June 2002; X v. Finland, no. 34806/04, §§ 220-222, ECHR 2012 (extracts); and Ustinova v. Russia, no. 7994/14, § 44, 8 November 2016)? Reference is made, inter alia, to the absence from the file of expert and specialist reports adduced by the applicant and accepted by the first-instance court in the first case (judgment of 26 November 2013 as upheld on 6 June 2014). - EGMR, 17.02.2004 - 39748/98
MAESTRI c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR - 77427/14
Was the applicant afforded sufficient procedural safeguards in the relevant proceedings (see, in the context of Article 8 of the Convention, Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 84, ECHR 2000-XI; Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I; P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-IX; Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963/99, § 123, 20 June 2002; X v. Finland, no. 34806/04, §§ 220-222, ECHR 2012 (extracts); and Ustinova v. Russia, no. 7994/14, § 44, 8 November 2016)? Reference is made, inter alia, to the absence from the file of expert and specialist reports adduced by the applicant and accepted by the first-instance court in the first case (judgment of 26 November 2013 as upheld on 6 June 2014). - EGMR, 12.02.2004 - 47287/99
PEREZ c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR - 77427/14
Did the applicant have a fair hearing as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, did the courts in the first case conduct a proper examination of the evidence adduced by him, without prejudice to their assessment of whether it was relevant (see Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 80, ECHR 2004-I), inter alia, as regards the parody exception?. - EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 34806/04
X v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR - 77427/14
Was the applicant afforded sufficient procedural safeguards in the relevant proceedings (see, in the context of Article 8 of the Convention, Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 84, ECHR 2000-XI; Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I; P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-IX; Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963/99, § 123, 20 June 2002; X v. Finland, no. 34806/04, §§ 220-222, ECHR 2012 (extracts); and Ustinova v. Russia, no. 7994/14, § 44, 8 November 2016)? Reference is made, inter alia, to the absence from the file of expert and specialist reports adduced by the applicant and accepted by the first-instance court in the first case (judgment of 26 November 2013 as upheld on 6 June 2014). - EGMR, 08.11.2016 - 7994/14
USTINOVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR - 77427/14
Was the applicant afforded sufficient procedural safeguards in the relevant proceedings (see, in the context of Article 8 of the Convention, Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 84, ECHR 2000-XI; Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I; P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-IX; Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963/99, § 123, 20 June 2002; X v. Finland, no. 34806/04, §§ 220-222, ECHR 2012 (extracts); and Ustinova v. Russia, no. 7994/14, § 44, 8 November 2016)? Reference is made, inter alia, to the absence from the file of expert and specialist reports adduced by the applicant and accepted by the first-instance court in the first case (judgment of 26 November 2013 as upheld on 6 June 2014).