Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 01.10.1990 - 14912/89 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1990,17033) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88
Jens Söring
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.10.1990 - 14912/89
However, expulsion may in exceptional circumstances involve a violation of the Convention, for instance where there is a serious fear of treatment contrary to Articles 2 and 3 (Art. 2, 3) of the Convention (see No. 10564/83, Dec. 10.12.84, D.R. 40 p. 262; mutatis mutandis Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, pp. 32 et seq.). - EKMR, 10.12.1984 - 10564/83
L. v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.10.1990 - 14912/89
However, expulsion may in exceptional circumstances involve a violation of the Convention, for instance where there is a serious fear of treatment contrary to Articles 2 and 3 (Art. 2, 3) of the Convention (see No. 10564/83, Dec. 10.12.84, D.R. 40 p. 262; mutatis mutandis Eur. Court H.R., Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, pp. 32 et seq.). - EKMR, 06.03.1980 - 8581/79
X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EKMR, 01.10.1990 - 14912/89
The Commission further recalls that in its previous case-law it has left open the question whether, from the standpoint of Article 3 (Art. 3) of the Convention, it may take into account an alleged danger arising, not only from public authorities, but also from autonomous groups (see No. 8581/79, Dec. 6.3.80, D.R. 29 p. 48).