Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 10.09.1997 - 32137/96 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,34047) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
WINTER v. GERMANY
Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (4)
- EKMR, 07.03.1991 - 14622/89
HEMPFING v. GERMANY
Auszug aus EKMR, 10.09.1997 - 32137/96
In the present case, the requirement of objectivity and the duty to refrain from insult and defamation formed part of the essence of professional duties, in accordance with the jurisprudence of the disciplinary courts and the Federal Constitutional Court (cf. No. 14622/89, Dec. 7.3.91, D.R. 69 p. 272).The Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether such a need exists, but it goes hand in hand with a European supervision (cf. Eur. Court HR, Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, pp. 29-30, para. 59; see also No. 14622/89, Dec. 7.3.91, loc. cit.).
- EGMR, 26.11.1991 - 13585/88
OBSERVER ET GUARDIAN c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 10.09.1997 - 32137/96
The Contracting States have a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether such a need exists, but it goes hand in hand with a European supervision (cf. Eur. Court HR, Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, pp. 29-30, para. 59; see also No. 14622/89, Dec. 7.3.91, loc. cit.). - EGMR, 25.03.1985 - 8734/79
Barthold ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EKMR, 10.09.1997 - 32137/96
Frequently laws are framed in a manner that is not absolutely precise and, in such cases, their interpretation and application are inevitably questions of practice (cf., mutatis mutandis, Eur. Court HR, Barthold v. Germany judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, pp. 21-23, paras. 45-48; Markt Intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 165, p. 18, para. 30). - EGMR, 20.11.1989 - 10572/83
MARKT INTERN VERLAG GMBH ET KLAUS BEERMANN c. ALLEMAGNE
Auszug aus EKMR, 10.09.1997 - 32137/96
Frequently laws are framed in a manner that is not absolutely precise and, in such cases, their interpretation and application are inevitably questions of practice (cf., mutatis mutandis, Eur. Court HR, Barthold v. Germany judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, pp. 21-23, paras. 45-48; Markt Intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 165, p. 18, para. 30).