Rechtsprechung
| EKMR, 17.05.1995 - 22441/93 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1995,29124) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
J.M. v. SWITZERLAND
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90
FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EKMR, 17.05.1995 - 22441/93
1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention if it does not pursue a legitimate aim and if there is not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be achieved (see, e.g., Eur. Court H.R., Fayed judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, para. 65). - EGMR, 19.12.1989 - 9783/82
KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EKMR, 17.05.1995 - 22441/93
However, the requirements of Article 13 (Art. 13) of the Convention are less strict than, and are here absorbed by, those of Article 6 (Art. 6) (see Eur. Court H.R., Kamasinski judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 168, p. 45, para. 110, with further references). - EGMR, 27.08.1991 - 12750/87
PHILIS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EKMR, 17.05.1995 - 22441/93
1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention embodies the right to a court, of which the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, constitutes one aspect (see Eur. Court H.R., Philis judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 209, p. 20, para. 59).