Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SCHMID v. AUSTRIA

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 2, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 23.09.1982 - 7151/75

  SPORRONG ET LÖNNROTH c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 22.02.1995 - 21956/93

  In the present case the refusal was found to be lawful by the Constitutional Court and there is nothing to show that the domestic decisions complained of arbitrarily disregard any vital interests of the applicant such as to upset the fair balance which has to be struck between the demands of the public interest of the community and the requirements of protection of the individual's fundamental rights (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Sporrong and Lönnroth judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 26 para. 59).
• EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89

  SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 22.02.1995 - 21956/93

  It follows that in the present case the Appellate Authority limited its control to points of law and in these particular circumstances oral argument was unnecessary (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Axen judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 72, p. 12-13, para. 28; Schuler-Zgraggen judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263 p. 20 para. 58).
• EGMR, 08.12.1983 - 8273/78

  Axen ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EKMR, 22.02.1995 - 21956/93

  It follows that in the present case the Appellate Authority limited its control to points of law and in these particular circumstances oral argument was unnecessary (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Axen judgment of 8 December 1983, Series A no. 72, p. 12-13, para. 28; Schuler-Zgraggen judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263 p. 20 para. 58).
• EKMR, 09.05.1986 - 11628/85

  LINDE v. SWEDEN

  Auszug aus EKMR, 22.02.1995 - 21956/93

  It can be left undecided whether this provision can be invoked by the applicant although, in principle, it does not guarantee a right to acquire possessions (Dec. 9.5.86, No. 11628/85, D.R. 47, 270).

• EKMR, 12.04.1996 - 23962/94

  BEER v. AUSTRIA

  However, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (P1-1) does not guarantee a right to acquire possessions (No. 11628/85, Dec. 9.5.86, D.R. 47, 270; Union of Atheists v. France, Comm. Report 6.7.94, para. 55; No. 21956/93, Dec. 22.2.95, unpublished).
• EKMR, 28.11.1994 - 23995/94

  DOWD AND McKENNA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  The Commission recalls that it considered a previous complaint by the applicants in No. 21956/93 which related to the refusal of transfer.