Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MAIKOE AND BABOELAL v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (8)

• EGMR, 21.06.1988 - 10730/84

  BERREHAB v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 22791/93

  Recalling that the policy followed by the Dutch authorities in immigration matters is clearly related to the economic well-being of the country, the purpose being, inter alia, to restrict immigration into a densely populated country (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Berrehab judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 138, p. 15, para. 26), the Commission accepts that the legitimate aim pursued is the preservation of the country's economic well-being within the meaning of Article 8 para.
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92

  HOKKANEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 22791/93

  Insofar as the second applicant complains that the expulsion of the first applicant would interfere with the second applicant's family life with her father, the Commission recalls that family life continues after divorce or separation (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Hokkanen judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, para. 54; No. 11526/85, Dec. 10.10.1986, D.R. 50 p. 219; and No. 12411/86, Dec. 4.3.1987, D.R. 51 p. 245).
• EKMR, 08.09.1988 - 13654/88

  R. v. the NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 22791/93

  The Commission recalls in the first place that the Convention does not, as such, guarantee an alien either the right to enter or to reside in a particular country, or a right not to be expelled therefrom (cf. No. 13654/88, Dec. 8.9.88, D.R. 57 p. 287).

 
• EKMR, 08.12.1981 - 9478/81

  X. v. the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

  Auszug aus EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 22791/93

  In determining whether the expulsion of an alien interferes with his or her right to respect for family life within the meaning of Article 8 (Art. 8), regard must be had to the practicability and reasonableness of the close members of family concerned accompanying or following the alien and not only to the links established in the host country, but also to their precarious nature where an initial residence permit has been conditional throughout (cf. No. 9478/81, Dec. 8.12.1981, D.R. 27 p. 243; and No. 11333/85, Dec. 17.5.85, D.R. 43 p. 227).
• EKMR, 01.07.1985 - 11278/84

  Famille K. et W. c. PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 22791/93

  This principle applies also where one or more of the deportee's family are nationals of the country ordering the expulsion (cf. No. 11278/84, Dec. 1.7.85, D.R. 43 p. 216).
• EKMR, 17.05.1985 - 11333/85

  C. v. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

  Auszug aus EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 22791/93

  In determining whether the expulsion of an alien interferes with his or her right to respect for family life within the meaning of Article 8 (Art. 8), regard must be had to the practicability and reasonableness of the close members of family concerned accompanying or following the alien and not only to the links established in the host country, but also to their precarious nature where an initial residence permit has been conditional throughout (cf. No. 9478/81, Dec. 8.12.1981, D.R. 27 p. 243; and No. 11333/85, Dec. 17.5.85, D.R. 43 p. 227).
• EKMR, 04.03.1987 - 12411/86

  M. c. L`ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 22791/93

  Insofar as the second applicant complains that the expulsion of the first applicant would interfere with the second applicant's family life with her father, the Commission recalls that family life continues after divorce or separation (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Hokkanen judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, para. 54; No. 11526/85, Dec. 10.10.1986, D.R. 50 p. 219; and No. 12411/86, Dec. 4.3.1987, D.R. 51 p. 245).
• EKMR, 10.10.1986 - 11526/85

  W. v. THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

  Auszug aus EKMR, 30.11.1994 - 22791/93

  Insofar as the second applicant complains that the expulsion of the first applicant would interfere with the second applicant's family life with her father, the Commission recalls that family life continues after divorce or separation (cf. Eur. Court H.R., Hokkanen judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, para. 54; No. 11526/85, Dec. 10.10.1986, D.R. 50 p. 219; and No. 12411/86, Dec. 4.3.1987, D.R. 51 p. 245).