Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ZAYIDOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Zayidov v. Azerbaijan

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (35)Zitiert selbst (9)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.03.2009 - 4378/02

  Recht auf ein faires Verfahren (heimliche Ermittlungsmethoden; Umgehungsverbot; …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 11948/08

  Until conviction, he must be presumed innocent, and the purpose of the provision under consideration is essentially to require his provisional release once his continuing detention ceases to be reasonable (see McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 41, ECHR 2006-X, and Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 61, 10 March 2009).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 11948/08

  Where such grounds were "relevant" and "sufficient", the Court must also be satisfied that the national authorities displayed "special diligence" in the conduct of the proceedings (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 153, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 27.06.1968 - 2122/64

  Wemhoff ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 11948/08

  The Convention case-law has developed four basic acceptable reasons for detaining a person before judgment when that person is suspected of having committed an offence: the risk that the accused would fail to appear for trial (see Stögmüller v. Austria, 10 November 1969, § 15, Series A no. 9); take action to prejudice the administration of justice if released (see Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, § 14, Series A no. 7); commit further offences (see Matznetter v. Austria, 10 November 1969, § 9, Series A no. 10); or cause public disorder (see Letellier, cited above, § 51).

• EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 543/03

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 11948/08

  Until conviction, he must be presumed innocent, and the purpose of the provision under consideration is essentially to require his provisional release once his continuing detention ceases to be reasonable (see McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 41, ECHR 2006-X, and Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 61, 10 March 2009).
• EGMR, 10.11.1969 - 1602/62

  Stögmüller ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 11948/08

  The Convention case-law has developed four basic acceptable reasons for detaining a person before judgment when that person is suspected of having committed an offence: the risk that the accused would fail to appear for trial (see Stögmüller v. Austria, 10 November 1969, § 15, Series A no. 9); take action to prejudice the administration of justice if released (see Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, § 14, Series A no. 7); commit further offences (see Matznetter v. Austria, 10 November 1969, § 9, Series A no. 10); or cause public disorder (see Letellier, cited above, § 51).
• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99

  SMIRNOVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 11948/08

  A person charged with an offence must always be released pending trial unless the State can show that there are "relevant and sufficient" reasons to justify the continued detention (see Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 58, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts), and Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, § 182, 31 May 2011).
• EGMR, 26.06.1991 - 12369/86

  LETELLIER c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 11948/08

  The domestic courts must examine all the facts arguing for or against the existence of a genuine requirement of public interest justifying, with due regard to the principle of the presumption of innocence, a departure from the rule of respect for individual liberty and set them out in their decisions on the applications for release (see Letellier v. France, 26 June 1991, § 35, Series A no. 207).
• EGMR, 12.12.1991 - 12718/87

  CLOOTH v. BELGIUM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 11948/08

  Arguments for and against release must not be general and abstract (see Clooth v. Belgium, 12 December 1991, § 44, Series A no. 225).
• EGMR, 10.11.1969 - 2178/64

  Matznetter ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 20.02.2014 - 11948/08

  The Convention case-law has developed four basic acceptable reasons for detaining a person before judgment when that person is suspected of having committed an offence: the risk that the accused would fail to appear for trial (see Stögmüller v. Austria, 10 November 1969, § 15, Series A no. 9); take action to prejudice the administration of justice if released (see Wemhoff v. Germany, 27 June 1968, § 14, Series A no. 7); commit further offences (see Matznetter v. Austria, 10 November 1969, § 9, Series A no. 10); or cause public disorder (see Letellier, cited above, § 51).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.08.2019 - 32631/09

  Fall Magnitski: Russland verletzte mehrfach Menschenrechte

  In this connection, the Court would once again stress that the gravity of the charges cannot by itself serve to justify long periods of detention (see Ramkovski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 33566/11, § 59, 8 February 2018; Novruz Ismayilov v. Azerbaijan, no. 16794/05, § 53, 20 February 2014; and Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948/08, § 59, 20 February 2014).
• EGMR, 08.10.2026 - 3395/17
  Rn. 7 In the leading cases of Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 37138/06, 9 November 2010, 1sayeva v. Azerbaijan, no. 36229/11, 25 June 2015 and Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948/08, 20 February 2014, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
• EGMR, 08.10.2026 - 57948/17
  Rn. 7 In the leading cases of Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 37138/06, 9 November 2010; Isayeva v. Azerbaijan, no. 36229/11, 25 June 2015; and Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948/08, 20 February 2014, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

• EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 37816/12

  ZEYNALLI v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application

  The Court has repeatedly found violations of Article 5 § 3 in previous Azerbaijani cases where similar shortcomings were noted and analysed in detail (see Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 37138/06, §§ 191-94, 9 November 2010; Muradverdiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16966/06, §§ 87-91, 9 December 2010; and Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948/08, §§ 64-68, 20 February 2014).
• EGMR, 20.10.2016 - 629/11

  ARA HARUTYUNYAN v. ARMENIA

  Arguments for and against release must not be general and abstract (see, among other authorities, Smirnova v. Russia, nos. 46133/99 and 48183/99, § 63, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts); Becciev v. Moldova, no. 9190/03, § 56, 4 October 2005; Piruzyan v. Armenia, no. 33376/07, § 92, 26 June 2012; Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948/08, § 57, 20 February 2014; and Merčep v. Croatia, no. 12301/12, § 79, 26 April 2016).
• EGMR, 27.02.2020 - 30778/15

  ISMAYILOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  In this connection, the Court observes that despite the Court's specific request for all documents relating to the criminal proceedings against the applicant to be submitted, no documents were provided by the Government demonstrating that any investigative measures had been carried out following the institution of criminal proceedings into the incident, in particular, in the period between 24 October and 25 November 2014 (compare Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948/08, § 44, 20 February 2014).
• EGMR, 18.02.2021 - 65583/13

  MAMMAD AZIZOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  They also failed to mention any case-specific facts relevant to those grounds and to substantiate them with relevant and sufficient reasons (see Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 37138/06, §§ 191-94, 9 November 2010; Muradverdiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 16966/06, §§ 87-91, 9 December 2010; and Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948/08, §§ 64-68, 20 February 2014).
• EGMR, 05.09.2024 - 39503/17

  MUKHTARLI v. AZERBAIJAN AND GEORGIA

  The Court has repeatedly found violations of Article 5 § 3 in previous cases against Azerbaijan where similar shortcomings were noted and analysed in detail (see Farhad Aliyev, cited above, §§ 191-94; Muradverdiyev, cited above, §§ 87-91; Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948/08, §§ 64-69, 20 February 2014; and Mammadov and Others v. Azerbaijan, no. 35432/07, §§ 97-100, 21 February 2019).
• EGMR, 24.03.2022 - 5386/10

  ZAYIDOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  By a presidential pardon given on 17 March 2010 he was released from serving the remainder of his sentence (for more details, see Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948/08, §§ 7-34, 20 February 2014).
• EGMR, 10.10.2024 - 12058/21

  HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Rn. 126 The Court considers that, in the circumstances of the present case, the available evidence, which was described in the prosecution's submissions to the courts and in the relevant court decisions, would raise a reasonable suspicion in an objective observer that the applicant had committed the criminal offences referred to and that it has not been shown that the evidence was not sufficient for this suspicion to persist throughout the entire period of his pre-trial detention (compare Farhad Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 37138/06, §§ 140-43, 9 November 2010; Rafig Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 45875/06, §§ 76-79, 6 December 2011; and Zayidov v. Azerbaijan, no. 11948/08, §§ 43-46, 20 February 2014).
• EGMR, 30.06.2022 - 20755/08

  AZADLIQ NEWSPAPER AND ZAYIDOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 01.02.2024 - 34015/17

  BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN and 2 other applications
• EGMR, 18.01.2024 - 4854/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 19.01.2023 - 60824/08

  ZAYIDOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 44286/12

  BADALYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 09.10.2025 - 31564/14

  HASHIMOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 41105/14

  ABDUL ABILOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 12.10.2023 - 20605/13

  GURBANOV AND MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 23.06.2022 - 45929/17

  IBISHBEYLI v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 04.06.2020 - 52158/13

  MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR - 24420/20 (anhängig)

  SULEYMANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR - 38220/22 (anhängig)

  RZAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN and 5 other applications
• EGMR, 09.10.2025 - 48832/15

  ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 38203/12

  SEYIDOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application
• EGMR, 19.10.2023 - 37714/17

  ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 21.09.2023 - 10084/21

  ALIYEV AND BABAYEv. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 19.05.2022 - 24849/18

  KHURSHIDOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 30.04.2020 - 72489/11

  MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 48255/11

  PANAHLI v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 20.07.2017 - 50520/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR - 16466/18 (anhängig)

  NURUZADE v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application
• EGMR, 01.09.2022 - 1459/14

  SADIGOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 17.03.2022 - 77612/11

  ISGANDAROV v. AZERBAIJAN and 9 other applications
• EGMR, 07.05.2025 - 14078/23

  MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 10.02.2022 - 43389/16

  HAJIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN