Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GASPAR v. RUSSIA

  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GASPAR v. RUSSIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (13)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 25.10.2016 - 1056/15

  DZHURAYEV AND SHALKOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 23038/15

  However, having regard to its conclusion above under Article 8 of the Convention, the Court considers it unnecessary to examine those issues separately under Article 13 of the Convention (see Kamenov, cited above, § 45, and Dzhurayev and Shalkova v. Russia, no. 1056/15, § 47, 25 October 2016).
• EGMR, 28.05.1985 - 9214/80

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 23038/15

  States are entitled to control the entry and residence of aliens on their territories (see, among many other authorities, Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom, § 67, 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, and Boujlifa v. France, 21 October 1997, § 42, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI).
• EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 23502/06

  Bomben auf kurdische Dörfer: Türkei muss Schmerzensgeld zahlen

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 23038/15

  Given that no explanations for such a failure had been given, the applicant, referring to Benzer and Others v. Turkey (no. 23502/06, § 160, 12 November 2013), invited the Court to draw inferences from the Government's failure to furnish all necessary facilities to the Court in its task of establishing the facts.
• EGMR, 26.07.2011 - 29157/09

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 23038/15

  For the relevant domestic law and practice, see Liu v. Russia (no. 2), no. 29157/09, §§ 45-52, 26 July 2011.
• EGMR, 26.06.2014 - 39428/12

  GABLISHVILI v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.06.2018 - 23038/15

  For the relevant Council of Europe material, see Gablishvili v. Russia, no. 39428/12, § 37, 26 June 2014.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 01.10.2026 - 32317/23

  CUNAJ v. HUNGARY

  Rn. 16 In the light of the Court's case-law in relation to matters of the kind in issue in the present case (see, for instance, Gaspar v. Russia, no. 23038/15, §§ 51-52, 12 June 2018), and in view of the way in which the applicant formulated his complaints, it falls to be examined solely under Article 8 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 15.12.2025 - 16915/21

  Rumänischer Richter, der sich online äußert: Disziplinarstrafe wegen …

  The Court will revert to this matter below (see paragraph 165 below), because the issue of safeguards against abuse that arises from the standpoint of the lawfulness of the interference overlaps with similar issues analysed from the standpoint of the "necessity in a democratic society" criterion provided for in Article 10 § 2 (see, mutatis mutandis, Gaspar v. Russia, no. 23038/15, § 41, 12 June 2018, and the cases cited therein, and Eminağaoğlu, cited above, § 150).
• EGMR, 07.05.2026 - 53371/18

  SENER v. POLAND

  Where there is an arguable claim that a measure threatens to interfere with an alien's right to respect for his or her private and family life, States must give the individual concerned an effective opportunity to challenge that measure and to have the issues examined with sufficient procedural safeguards and thoroughness by an appropriate domestic forum offering adequate guarantees of independence and impartiality (see Gaspar v. Russia, no. 23038/15, § 42, 12 June 2018).

• EGMR, 16.05.2024 - 15117/21

  MIRZOYAN v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC and 1 other application

  Accordingly, national decision-making bodies should, in principle, advert to and assess evidence in respect of the practicality, feasibility and proportionality of any removal of a non-national parent in order to give effective protection and sufficient weight to the best interests of the children directly affected by it (ibid., § 109; Sarközi and Mahran v. Austria, no. 27945/10, § 64, 2 April 2015; and Gaspar v. Russia, no. 23038/15, § 39, 12 June 2018).
• EGMR, 19.09.2024 - 5488/22

  TRAPITSYNA AND ISAEVA v. HUNGARY

  Where there is an arguable claim that the measure threatens to interfere with an alien's right to respect for his or her private and family life, States must make available to the individual concerned the effective possibility of challenging the measure and having the relevant issues examined with sufficient procedural safeguards and thoroughness by an appropriate domestic forum offering adequate guarantees of independence and impartiality (see Gaspar v. Russia, no. 23038/15, § 42, 12 June 2018).
• EGMR, 07.03.2023 - 54003/20

  KOGAN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court reiterates that the removal of a person from a country where close family members are living may amount to an infringement of the right to respect for family life, as guaranteed by Article 8 § 1 of the Convention (see Gaspar v. Russia, no. 23038/15, § 39, 12 June 2018, with further references).
• EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 52693/12

  S.L. c. ROUMANIE et 2 autres affaires

  Consciente de son rôle subsidiaire et de l'ample marge d'appréciation laissée aux États en matière de sécurité nationale, elle admet qu'il appartient à chaque État, en tant que gardien de la sécurité de sa population, de procéder à sa propre évaluation quant aux questions de sécurité nationale, en se fondant sur les faits qu'il connaît (Gaspar c. Russie, no 23038/15, § 43, 12 juin 2018, et Liu c. Russie (no 2), no 29157/09, § 85, 26 juillet 2011).
• EGMR, 09.07.2019 - 14918/14

  ROZKHANI v. RUSSIA

  A summary of the relevant general principles can be found in Gaspar v Russia, no. 23038/15, 12 June 2018, §§ 38-39 and 41-45.
• EGMR - 22819/23 (anhängig)

  BEKIK v. GEORGIA

  Has there been an interference with the applicant' s right to respect for his private and/or family life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention (see Gaspar v. Russia, no. 23038/15, 12 June 2018)? If so, was that interference in accordance with the law and necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2? In particular, were the relevant domestic proceedings attended by sufficient procedural guarantees?.
• EGMR - 30630/24 (anhängig)

  M.D. v. GEORGIA

  Has there been an interference with the applicant' s right to respect for his private and/or family life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention (see Gaspar v. Russia, no. 23038/15, 12 June 2018; Mirzoyan v. the Czech Republic, nos. 15117/21 and 15689/21, 16 May 2024; and Trapitsyna and Isaeva v. Hungary, no. 5488/22, 19 September 2024)? If so, was that interference in accordance with the law and necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2? In particular, were the relevant domestic proceedings attended by sufficient procedural guarantees?.
• EGMR - 27255/24 (anhängig)

  S.D. v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 12454/19

  ELDESUKI v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 51973/18

  AL-TBAKHI v. RUSSIA