Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GUDMUNDSSON v. ICELAND

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

• EGMR, 08.07.1986 - 9006/80

  LITHGOW AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EKMR, 17.01.1996 - 23285/94

  Furthermore, the Contracting States enjoy a certain margin of appreciation in assessing whether and to what extent the differences justify a different treatment in law (cf. e.g. Eur. Court H.R., Lithgow and Others judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, pp. 66-67, para. 177).
• EGMR, 28.10.1987 - 8695/79

  Inze ./. Österreich

  Auszug aus EKMR, 17.01.1996 - 23285/94

  Although the application of Article 14 (Art. 14) does not presuppose a breach of one or more of such provisions there can be no room for its application unless the facts of the case fall within the ambit of one or more of the latter (cf. for example Eur. Court H.R., Inze judgment of 28 October 1987, Series A no. 126, para. 36, p. 17).
• EGMR, 18.02.1991 - 12033/86

  FREDIN c. SUÈDE (N° 1)

  Auszug aus EKMR, 17.01.1996 - 23285/94

  As regards the elements of discrimination, as alleged by the applicant, the Commission recalls that Article 14 (Art. 14) affords protection against discrimination, that is treating differently, without objective and reasonable justification, persons in "relevantly" similar situations (cf. e.g. Eur. Court H.R., Fredin judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A no. 192, p. 19, para. 60).
• EGMR, 27.10.1987 - 10426/83

  PUDAS c. SUÈDE

  Auszug aus EKMR, 17.01.1996 - 23285/94

  It follows, in the Commission's opinion, that a licence-holder cannot be considered to have a reasonable and legitimate expectation to continue his activities, if the conditions attached to the licence are no longer fulfilled or if the licence is withdrawn in accordance with the provisions of the law which were in force when the licence was issued (cf. No. 10426/83, Dec. 5.12.84, D.R. 40 p. 234).
• EKMR, 13.12.1979 - 8410/78

  X. v. the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

  Auszug aus EKMR, 17.01.1996 - 23285/94

  As regards expectations for future earnings, the Commission also recalls its previous case-law to the effect that future income could only be considered to constitute a "possession", if it had already been earned or where an enforceable claim existed to it (cf. Dec. 8410/78, 13.12.79, D.R. 18, p. 216 at 219).

• EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 42184/05

  CARSON ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  In addition, the Commission examined complaints about discrepancies in the law applying in different areas of a single Contracting State (Lindsay and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 8364/78, Commission decision of 8 March 1979, Decisions and Reports 15, p. 247; Gudmundsson v. Iceland, no. 23285/94, Commission decision of 17 January 1996, unreported).
• EGMR, 04.11.2008 - 42184/05

  Carson et autres ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Pour sa part, la Commission a examiné des griefs tenant à l'existence de disparités juridiques entre les régions d'un même Etat contractant (Lindsay et autres c. Royaume-Uni, no 8364/78, décision de la Commission du 8 mars 1979, DR 15, p. 247 ; et Gudmundsson c. Islande, no 23285/94, décision de la Commission du 17 juin 1996, non publiée).