Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PRINT ZEITUNGSVERLAG GMBH v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1 MRK
  No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PRINT ZEITUNGSVERLAG GMBH v. AUSTRIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

  [DEU] No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Print Zeitungsverlag GmbH v. Austria

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89

  JERSILD v. DENMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 26547/07

  It has repeatedly held that "punishment of a journalist for assisting in the dissemination of statements made by another person... would seriously hamper the contribution of the press to discussion of matters of public interest and should not be envisaged unless there are particularly strong reasons for doing so" (see Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 35, Series A no. 298; Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, § 62, ECHR 2001-III; and Verlagsgruppe News GmbH v. Austria, no. 76918/01, § 31, 14 December 2006).
• EGMR, 29.03.2001 - 38432/97

  THOMA v. LUXEMBOURG

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 26547/07

  It has repeatedly held that "punishment of a journalist for assisting in the dissemination of statements made by another person... would seriously hamper the contribution of the press to discussion of matters of public interest and should not be envisaged unless there are particularly strong reasons for doing so" (see Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 35, Series A no. 298; Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, § 62, ECHR 2001-III; and Verlagsgruppe News GmbH v. Austria, no. 76918/01, § 31, 14 December 2006).
• EGMR, 14.12.2006 - 76918/01

  VERLAGSGRUPPE NEWS GMBH v. AUSTRIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 26547/07

  It has repeatedly held that "punishment of a journalist for assisting in the dissemination of statements made by another person... would seriously hamper the contribution of the press to discussion of matters of public interest and should not be envisaged unless there are particularly strong reasons for doing so" (see Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 35, Series A no. 298; Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, § 62, ECHR 2001-III; and Verlagsgruppe News GmbH v. Austria, no. 76918/01, § 31, 14 December 2006).
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.10.2013 - 26547/07

  40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 101-102, ECHR 2012; and Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, §§ 78-81, 7 February 2012).

• EGMR, 16.06.2015 - 64569/09

  Betreiber haftet für Nutzerkommentare

  En revanche, dans l'affaire Print Zeitungsverlag GmbH c. Autriche (no 26547/07, arrêt rendu le 10 octobre 2013, soit le même jour que l'arrêt de chambre dans l'affaire Delfi), la Cour a dit que l'octroi d'une somme de 2 000 euros (EUR) en dédommagement de la publication d'une lettre dans la presse écrite était - et ce à juste titre - compatible avec sa jurisprudence antérieure[7].
• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 22947/13

  News-Portal: Keine Haftung für Nutzerkommentare

  Even accepting the domestic courts" qualification of the applicants" conduct as "disseminating" defamatory statements, the applicant's liability is difficult to reconcile with the existing case-law according to which "punishment of a journalist for assisting in the dissemination of statements made by another person in an interview would seriously hamper the contribution of the press to discussion of matters of public interest and should not be envisaged unless there are particularly strong reasons for doing so" (see Jersild, cited above, § 35; Thoma v. Luxembourg, no. 38432/97, § 62, ECHR 2001-III; and, mutatis mutandis, Verlagsgruppe News GmbH v. Austria, no. 76918/01, § 31, 14 December 2006, Print Zeitungsverlag GmbH v. Austria, no. 26547/07, § 39, 10 October 2013; and Delfi AS, cited above, § 135).