Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PANAYOTOVA v. BULGARIA

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Zitiert selbst (9)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 48380/99

  TODOROVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 27636/04

  43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01, and 194/02, 15 March 2007.

  48380/99, 51362/99, 60036/00 and 73465/01, §§ 10 and 47, 24 April 2008).

• EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 51362/99

  ENEVA AND DOBREV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 27636/04

  43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01, and 194/02, 15 March 2007.

  48380/99, 51362/99, 60036/00 and 73465/01, §§ 10 and 47, 24 April 2008).

• EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 73465/01

  TZILEVI v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 27636/04

  43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01, and 194/02, 15 March 2007.

  48380/99, 51362/99, 60036/00 and 73465/01, §§ 10 and 47, 24 April 2008).

• EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 60036/00

  BOGDANOVI v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 27636/04

  43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01, and 194/02, 15 March 2007.

  48380/99, 51362/99, 60036/00 and 73465/01, §§ 10 and 47, 24 April 2008).

• EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98

  VELIKOVI AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 27636/04

  43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01, and 194/02, 15 March 2007.
• EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 194/02

  NIKOLOVI v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 27636/04

  43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01, and 194/02, 15 March 2007.
• EGMR, 26.02.2009 - 42617/02

  VLADIMIROVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 27636/04

  However, as the Court found in Velikovi and Others cited above, § 226, and in a number of subsequent cases (see Koprinarovi v. Bulgaria, no. 57176/00, § 31, 15 January 2009; Dimitar and Anka Dimitrovi v. Bulgaria, no. 56753/00, § 31, 12 February 2009; and Vladimirova and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 42617/02, § 40, 26 February 2009), owing to the instability of bond prices and the frequent changes in the relevant rules, it could not be considered that at the time the bond scheme secured adequate compensation.
• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 57176/00

  KOPRINAROVI v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 27636/04

  However, as the Court found in Velikovi and Others cited above, § 226, and in a number of subsequent cases (see Koprinarovi v. Bulgaria, no. 57176/00, § 31, 15 January 2009; Dimitar and Anka Dimitrovi v. Bulgaria, no. 56753/00, § 31, 12 February 2009; and Vladimirova and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 42617/02, § 40, 26 February 2009), owing to the instability of bond prices and the frequent changes in the relevant rules, it could not be considered that at the time the bond scheme secured adequate compensation.
• EGMR, 12.02.2009 - 55722/00

  SIMOVA AND GEORGIEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.07.2009 - 27636/04

  As the proceedings the applicant brought were directly related to the violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 found in the present case, in that the applicant attempted to obtain at least partial compensation, the Court considers that the expenses in question were necessarily incurred (see, mutatis mutandis, Krushev v. Bulgaria, no. 66535/01, §§ 63-65, 3 July 2008, and Simova and Georgiev v. Bulgaria, no. 55722/00, § 49, 12 February 2009).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 07.01.2010 - 30945/04

  KAYRIAKOVI v. BULGARIA

  In particular, the legislative changes of June 2006 did not give rise to a new entitlement to bonds for persons who had missed the relevant time-limit (see Velikovi and Others, cited above, § 139; Panayotova v. Bulgaria, no. 27636/04, § 11, 2 July 2009; and Gyuleva and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 76963/01, § 26, 25 June 2009).

  Furthermore, as it was noted by the Court in Velikovi and Others, cited above, and other relevant judgments against Bulgaria, the Restitution Law of 1992, as applied by the Bulgarian courts, treated as null and void ab initio not only real property transactions which involved material breaches of substantive legal rules, but also transactions in which minor omissions imputable to the State administration, not the individual concerned, had been uncovered (see Velikovi and Others, cited above, §§ 79, 90 and 98-99; Peshevi v. Bulgaria, no. 29722/04, § 9, 2 July 2009; and Panayotova v. Bulgaria, no. 27636/04, § 9, 2 July 2009).

• EGMR, 21.07.2016 - 50506/09

  TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. BULGARIA

  The Court further finds, as in Velikovi and Others (cited above, § 167) and the follow-up cases (for example, Panayotova v. Bulgaria, no. 27636/04, § 20, 2 July 2009), that the question of the quality of the applicable law is indissociable from the question of whether the specific interference with the applicants' property rights had a legitimate aim and was necessary in a democratic society for the achievement of this aim.
• EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 3413/05

  GEORGIEVA AND MUKAREVA v. BULGARIA

  In view thereof, and also noting that Ms Margaritova-Vuchkova has represented other applicants in identical cases (see, for example Panayotova v. Bulgaria, no. 27636/04, 2 July 2009, and Tsonkovi, cited above), the Court awards EUR 2, 000 under this head, EUR 410 of which to be paid to the applicants and the remainder, EUR 1, 590, directly into the bank account of Ms Margaritova-Vuchkova.

• EGMR, 12.11.2014 - 56753/00

  DIMITAR AND ANKA DIMITROVI AND 12 OTHER CASES AGAINST BULGARIA

  27636/04.
• EGMR, 30.03.2017 - 65688/12

  STEFANOVI v. BULGARIA

  The Court observes that the present case is of the type it examined in the leading case of Velikovi and Others (cited above) and a number of follow-up cases (see, for example, Dimitar and Anka Dimitrovi v. Bulgaria, no. 56753/00, 12 February 2009; Panayotova v. Bulgaria, no. 27636/04, 2 July 2009; and Madzharov v. Bulgaria, no. 40149/05, 2 September 2010).
• EGMR, 05.02.2013 - 53988/07

  BASHIKAROVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA

  The Court is of the view that this complaint, which is of the type examined in the case of Velikovi and Others, cited above, and a series of follow-up cases (see, for example, Simova and Georgiev v. Bulgaria, no. 55722/00, 12 February 2009; Panayotova v. Bulgaria, no. 27636/04, 2 July 2009; Madzharov v. Bulgaria, no. 40149/05, 2 September 2010; Dzhagarova and Others v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 5191/05, 3 March 2009), is most appropriately examined under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 alone, which reads as follows:.
• EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 17241/06

  YONKOV v. BULGARIA

  These deficiencies are attributable to the State authorities, not the applicant (see, for example, Velikovi and Others, cited above, §§ 218 and 223, and Panayotova v. Bulgaria, no. 27636/04, § 21, 2 July 2009).