Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98, 45437/99, 48380/99, 48014/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01, 194/02 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
VELIKOVI AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
No violation of P1-1 for some applicants Violation of P1-1 for the others No violation of Art. 6 (one applicant) Not necessary to examine Arts.13 and 14 Just satisfaction partially reserved Costs and expenses partial award (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 43278/98
- EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98, 45437/99, 48380/99, 48014/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01, 194/02
- EGMR, 01.02.2017 - 43278/98
Wird zitiert von ... (25) Neu Zitiert selbst (8)
- EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70
GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
The right of access to a court includes not only the right to institute proceedings but also the right to obtain a determination of the dispute by a court (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, pp. 13-18, §§ 28-36; Osman v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, p. 3166, § 136, and p. 3169, § 147; and Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 25, ECHR 2002-II). - EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94
CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
In determining whether this requirement is met, the Court recognises that the State enjoys a wide margin of appreciation with regard both to choosing the means of enforcement and to ascertaining whether the consequences of enforcement are justified in the general interest for the purpose of achieving the object of the law in question (see Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, § 75, ECHR 1999-III). - EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95
Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
The fact that the Supreme Administrative Court later adopted the view that there was no "right" to purchase a municipal apartment under section 5 § 2 of the Compensation Law did not remove, retrospectively, the arguability of the applicant's claim at the time it was submitted for adjudication (see Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 89, ECHR 2001-V and Yanakiev v. Bulgaria, no. 40476/98, § 58, 10 August 2006).
- EGMR, 28.06.1990 - 11761/85
Obermeier ./. Österreich
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
This does not mean, however, that the applicants were denied access to a court, provided that the dispute which they submitted for adjudication was the subject of a genuine examination (see, mutatis mutandis, Obermeier v. Austria, judgment of 28 June 1990, Series A no. 179, p. 21, § 68). - EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
In particular, there must be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised by any measure depriving a person of his possessions (see Pressos Compania Naviera S.A. and Others v. Belgium, judgment of 20 November 1995, Series A no. 332, p. 23, § 38). - EGMR, 01.03.2002 - 48778/99
KUTIC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
The right of access to a court includes not only the right to institute proceedings but also the right to obtain a determination of the dispute by a court (see Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, pp. 13-18, §§ 28-36; Osman v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, p. 3166, § 136, and p. 3169, § 147; and Kutic v. Croatia, no. 48778/99, § 25, ECHR 2002-II). - EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 36548/97
PINCOVÁ ET PINC c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
In the Government's view, the present case was different from Pincová and Pinc v. the Czech Republic (no. 36548/97, § 51, ECHR 2002-VIII) where in somewhat similar circumstances the Court had found that the proportionality requirement had not been complied with. - EGMR, 10.08.2006 - 40476/98
YANAKIEV v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
The fact that the Supreme Administrative Court later adopted the view that there was no "right" to purchase a municipal apartment under section 5 § 2 of the Compensation Law did not remove, retrospectively, the arguability of the applicant's claim at the time it was submitted for adjudication (see Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 89, ECHR 2001-V and Yanakiev v. Bulgaria, no. 40476/98, § 58, 10 August 2006).
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10
Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände
43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01 and 194/02, §§ 268-73, 15 March 2007; Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108/02, §§ 221 and 223, 5 November 2009; Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939/03, § 131, ECHR 2009; Finger, cited above, §§ 140 and 142; Ponomaryovi v. Bulgaria, no. 5335/05, §§ 73 and 75, ECHR 2011; Ivan Stoyanov Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 7963/05, §§ 41 and 43, 4 June 2013; and Dimitrov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 77938/11, §§ 185-87 and 190, 1 July 2014). - EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 41661/05
YAVASHEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 5334/11
KRASTEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 12278/03
PADALEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 08.03.2011 - 71243/01
VISTINS AND PEREPJOLKINS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 43449/02
MILEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 25.10.2011 - 2033/04
VALKOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 38515/03
ION CONSTANTIN c. ROUMANIE
Qu'il s'agisse de l'application de la législation spécifique relative à la réparation des injustices commises par un ancien régime ou de l'attribution ou de la vente d'un bien par les autorités en vertu de dispositions légales d'autre nature, la Cour a toujours pris en compte, comme un critère essentiel dans l'examen de la proportionnalité de la privation, la question de la responsabilité des parties dans l'irrégularité sanctionnée par l'annulation du titre et le caractère essentiel ou au contraire plutôt mineur de cette irrégularité (voir, entre autres et mutatis mutandis, Velikovi et autres c. Bulgarie, nos 43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01 et 194/02, § 186, 15 mars 2007 ; Gashi c. Croatie, no 32457/05, §§ 33-40, 13 décembre 2007, Ichim c. Roumanie, no 164/02, § 38, 10 mars 2009, Toscuta et autres c. Roumanie, no 36900/03, § 38, 25 novembre 2008, et Ciovica c. Roumanie, no 3076/02, § 92, 31 mars 2009). - EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 17467/07
PAUKSTIS v. LITHUANIA
The Court takes cognisance of the fact that the present case concerns restitution of property and is not unmindful of the complexity of the legal and factual issues a State faces when resolving such questions (see Velikovi and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01 and 194/02, § 166, 15 March 2007). - EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 38334/08
ANCHEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 51752/10
KAVALIAUSKAS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 45092/07
PYRANTIENE v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 57675/09
ZILINSKIENE v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 36561/05
OTAVA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 17868/07
KOSTADIN MIHAYLOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 24546/09
ZAHI v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 27576/05
ALEKSA v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 73465/01
TZILEVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 48380/99
TODOROVA v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 32066/06
ZENTAS LOGINAS MUZEJS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 8947/05
GERDZHIKOV AND CHATEAU VALLEE DES ROSES EOOD v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 09.06.2011 - 37400/06
TESAR ET AUTRES c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32457/05
GASHI v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 26892/05
IGARIENE AND PETRAUSKIENE v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 16563/03
ELENA ET MIHAI TOMA c. ROUMANIE
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 48380/99, 51362/99, 60036/00, 73465/01 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TODOROVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Art. 41 MRK
Non-pecuniary damage - award Pecuniary damage - award Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 48380/99
- EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 48380/99, 51362/99, 60036/00, 73465/01
Wird zitiert von ... (22) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97
COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 48380/99
In particular, if one or more heads of damage cannot be calculated precisely or if the distinction between pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage proves difficult, the Court may decide to make a global assessment (see Comingersoll S.A. v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, § 29, ECHR 2000-IV).
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10
Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände
43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01 and 194/02, §§ 268-73, 15 March 2007; Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108/02, §§ 221 and 223, 5 November 2009; Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939/03, § 131, ECHR 2009; Finger, cited above, §§ 140 and 142; Ponomaryovi v. Bulgaria, no. 5335/05, §§ 73 and 75, ECHR 2011; Ivan Stoyanov Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 7963/05, §§ 41 and 43, 4 June 2013; and Dimitrov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 77938/11, §§ 185-87 and 190, 1 July 2014). - EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 41661/05
YAVASHEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 07.07.2009 - 12278/03
PADALEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 20.09.2011 - 17854/04
SHESTI MAI ENGINEERING OOD AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
48380/99, 51362/99, 60036/00 and 73465/01, § 8 in limine, 24 April 2008; and Kushoglu v. Bulgaria (just satisfaction), no. 48191/99, §§ 11-15, 3 July 2008). - EGMR, 08.03.2011 - 71243/01
VISTINS AND PEREPJOLKINS v. LATVIA
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 43449/02
MILEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 25.10.2011 - 2033/04
VALKOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 07.02.2017 - 9580/03
GÜMRÜKÇÜLER ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Elle souligne aussi que, conformément aux principes dégagés par sa jurisprudence constante, la forme et le montant de la satisfaction équitable tendant à la réparation d'un préjudice diffèrent selon les cas et dépendent directement de la nature de la violation constatée (Sovtransavto Holding c. Ukraine (satisfaction équitable), no 48553/99, §§ 52- 55, 2 octobre 2003, Todorova et autres c. Bulgarie (satisfaction équitable), nos 48380/99, 51362/99, 60036/00 et 73465/01, §§ 8 et suivants, 24 avril 2008, et Plechanow, précité, § 24). - EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 38515/03
ION CONSTANTIN c. ROUMANIE
Qu'il s'agisse de l'application de la législation spécifique relative à la réparation des injustices commises par un ancien régime ou de l'attribution ou de la vente d'un bien par les autorités en vertu de dispositions légales d'autre nature, la Cour a toujours pris en compte, comme un critère essentiel dans l'examen de la proportionnalité de la privation, la question de la responsabilité des parties dans l'irrégularité sanctionnée par l'annulation du titre et le caractère essentiel ou au contraire plutôt mineur de cette irrégularité (voir, entre autres et mutatis mutandis, Velikovi et autres c. Bulgarie, nos 43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01 et 194/02, § 186, 15 mars 2007 ; Gashi c. Croatie, no 32457/05, §§ 33-40, 13 décembre 2007, Ichim c. Roumanie, no 164/02, § 38, 10 mars 2009, Toscuta et autres c. Roumanie, no 36900/03, § 38, 25 novembre 2008, et Ciovica c. Roumanie, no 3076/02, § 92, 31 mars 2009). - EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 17467/07
PAUKSTIS v. LITHUANIA
The Court takes cognisance of the fact that the present case concerns restitution of property and is not unmindful of the complexity of the legal and factual issues a State faces when resolving such questions (see Velikovi and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01 and 194/02, § 166, 15 March 2007). - EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 38334/08
ANCHEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 45092/07
PYRANTIENE v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 57675/09
ZILINSKIENE v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 22279/04
PLECHANOW c. POLOGNE
- EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 36561/05
OTAVA c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 17868/07
KOSTADIN MIHAYLOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 24546/09
ZAHI v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 27576/05
ALEKSA v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 09.06.2011 - 37400/06
TESAR ET AUTRES c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32457/05
GASHI v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 26892/05
IGARIENE AND PETRAUSKIENE v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 16563/03
ELENA ET MIHAI TOMA c. ROUMANIE
Rechtsprechung
EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 73465/01 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
TZILEVI v. BULGARIA
Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 MRK
Admissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (12) Neu Zitiert selbst (1)
- EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
VELIKOVI AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 73465/01
These are summarised in application no. 43278/98, Velikov and Others v. Bulgaria.
- EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 36925/10
Gefängnisse in Bulgarien: Unwürdige Zustände
43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01 and 194/02, §§ 268-73, 15 March 2007; Kolevi v. Bulgaria, no. 1108/02, §§ 221 and 223, 5 November 2009; Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia [GC], no. 14939/03, § 131, ECHR 2009; Finger, cited above, §§ 140 and 142; Ponomaryovi v. Bulgaria, no. 5335/05, §§ 73 and 75, ECHR 2011; Ivan Stoyanov Vasilev v. Bulgaria, no. 7963/05, §§ 41 and 43, 4 June 2013; and Dimitrov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 77938/11, §§ 185-87 and 190, 1 July 2014). - EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 41661/05
YAVASHEV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 5334/11
KRASTEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 25.11.2010 - 43449/02
MILEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 17467/07
PAUKSTIS v. LITHUANIA
The Court takes cognisance of the fact that the present case concerns restitution of property and is not unmindful of the complexity of the legal and factual issues a State faces when resolving such questions (see Velikovi and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 43278/98, 45437/99, 48014/99, 48380/99, 51362/99, 53367/99, 60036/00, 73465/01 and 194/02, § 166, 15 March 2007). - EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 38334/08
ANCHEV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 45092/07
PYRANTIENE v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 01.12.2015 - 57675/09
ZILINSKIENE v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 17868/07
KOSTADIN MIHAYLOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 18.03.2014 - 24546/09
ZAHI v. CROATIA
- EGMR, 21.07.2009 - 27576/05
ALEKSA v. LITHUANIA
- EGMR, 13.12.2016 - 32066/06
ZENTAS LOGINAS MUZEJS v. LATVIA