Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32457/05 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,59693) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
GASHI v. CROATIA
Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of P1-1 Remainder inadmissible Just satisfaction reserved (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32457/05
- EGMR, 09.10.2008 - 32457/05
- EGMR, 14.09.2011 - 32457/05
Wird zitiert von ... (0) Neu Zitiert selbst (11)
- EGMR, 05.11.2002 - 36548/97
PINCOVÁ ET PINC c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32457/05
The Court recalls that it has already dealt with the question of annulment of contracts of sale under which applicants bought flats they occupied (see Panikian v. Bulgaria, cited above; Pincová and Pinc v. the Czech Republic, no. 36548/97, ECHR 2002-VIII; Becvár and Becvárová v. the Czech Republic, no. 58358/00, 14 December 2004; Netolický and Netolická v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 55727/00, 25 May 2004; Mohylová v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 75115/01, 6 September 2005, and Velikovi and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. - EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 58358/00
BECVAR AND BECVAROVA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32457/05
The Court recalls that it has already dealt with the question of annulment of contracts of sale under which applicants bought flats they occupied (see Panikian v. Bulgaria, cited above; Pincová and Pinc v. the Czech Republic, no. 36548/97, ECHR 2002-VIII; Becvár and Becvárová v. the Czech Republic, no. 58358/00, 14 December 2004; Netolický and Netolická v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 55727/00, 25 May 2004; Mohylová v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 75115/01, 6 September 2005, and Velikovi and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. - EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 194/02
NIKOLOVI v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 51362/99
ENEVA AND DOBREV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 12.05.2005 - 53367/99
STOYANOVA AND IVANOV v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 06.09.2005 - 75115/01
MOHYLOVÁ c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32457/05
The Court recalls that it has already dealt with the question of annulment of contracts of sale under which applicants bought flats they occupied (see Panikian v. Bulgaria, cited above; Pincová and Pinc v. the Czech Republic, no. 36548/97, ECHR 2002-VIII; Becvár and Becvárová v. the Czech Republic, no. 58358/00, 14 December 2004; Netolický and Netolická v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 55727/00, 25 May 2004; Mohylová v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 75115/01, 6 September 2005, and Velikovi and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. - EGMR, 15.03.2007 - 43278/98
VELIKOVI AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 17373/02
ROSINSKI v. POLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32457/05
Despite the margin of appreciation given to the State the Court must nevertheless, in the exercise of its power of review, determine whether the requisite balance was maintained in a manner consonant with the applicant's right to property (see Rosinski v Poland, no. 17373/02, § 78, 17 July 2007). - EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 48380/99
TODOROVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
- EGMR, 25.10.1989 - 10842/84
ALLAN JACOBSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1)
Auszug aus EGMR, 13.12.2007 - 32457/05
The Court, noting that its power to review compliance with domestic law is limited (see, among other authorities, Allan Jacobsson v. Sweden (no. 1), judgment of 25 October 1989, Series A no. 163, p. 17, § 57), is thus satisfied that the nullification of the applicant's property title was in accordance with domestic law. - EGMR, 20.11.1995 - 17849/91
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE