Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  STEFANUT v. ROMANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 2 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 5667/02

  KÉRÉTCHACHVILI c. GEORGIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2012 - 28713/05

  It recalls that an application may be rejected as abusive under Article 35 § 3 of the Convention if, among other reasons, it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see Vasilevskiy v. Latvia (dec.), no. 73485/01, 10 January 2012, Keretchashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, 2 May 2006 and Rehak v. Czech Republic (dec.), no. 67208/01, 18 May 2004).
• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 67208/01

  REHÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2012 - 28713/05

  It recalls that an application may be rejected as abusive under Article 35 § 3 of the Convention if, among other reasons, it was knowingly based on untrue facts (see Vasilevskiy v. Latvia (dec.), no. 73485/01, 10 January 2012, Keretchashvili v. Georgia (dec.), no. 5667/02, 2 May 2006 and Rehak v. Czech Republic (dec.), no. 67208/01, 18 May 2004).
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 14102/02

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2012 - 28713/05

  Incomplete and therefore misleading information may also amount to an abuse of the right of application, especially if the information concerns the very core of the case and no sufficient explanation is given for the failure to disclose that information (see Khvichia v. Georgia (dec.), no. 26446/06, 23 June 2009; Bekauri v. Georgia (preliminary objection), no. 14102/02, § 24, 10 April 2012 and Alboreo v. France (dec.), no. 56022/10, 15 May 2012).
• EGMR, 23.06.2009 - 26446/06

  KHVICHIA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2012 - 28713/05

  Incomplete and therefore misleading information may also amount to an abuse of the right of application, especially if the information concerns the very core of the case and no sufficient explanation is given for the failure to disclose that information (see Khvichia v. Georgia (dec.), no. 26446/06, 23 June 2009; Bekauri v. Georgia (preliminary objection), no. 14102/02, § 24, 10 April 2012 and Alboreo v. France (dec.), no. 56022/10, 15 May 2012).
• EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 56022/10

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.09.2012 - 28713/05

  Incomplete and therefore misleading information may also amount to an abuse of the right of application, especially if the information concerns the very core of the case and no sufficient explanation is given for the failure to disclose that information (see Khvichia v. Georgia (dec.), no. 26446/06, 23 June 2009; Bekauri v. Georgia (preliminary objection), no. 14102/02, § 24, 10 April 2012 and Alboreo v. France (dec.), no. 56022/10, 15 May 2012).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 45879/09

  S.C. RED CREDIT S.R.L. v. ROMANIA

  The Government argued that in a number of cases lodged against Romania, in particular Marinescu v. Romania ((dec.), no. 21122/02, 10 April 2007), Predescu v. Romania (no. 21447/03, § 25, 2 December 2008), Vasile Cir v. Romania ((dec.), no. 52330/07, 26 January 2010) and Ştefănuţ v. Romania ((dec.), no. 28713/05, 4 September 2012), the Court had considered that the applicants' failure to submit information which had been essential for the examination of the cases had amounted to an abuse of the right of application or had cast doubt on their good faith and had declared the applications or part thereof inadmissible.