Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 27.06.2024 - 32241/18, 54308/18, 58149/19, 59374/19, 61257/19 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
PAVLIKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-4 - Procedural guarantees of review);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention) (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
PAVLIKOVA v. RUSSIA and 4 other applications
[ENG]
Wird zitiert von ... Zitiert selbst (9)
- EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 5826/03
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2024 - 32241/18
Rn. 9 In the leading cases of Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154-58, 161-65, 22 May 2012, Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, §§ 219-48, 31 May 2011, and Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493/04, §§ 75-115, 25 October 2007, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.lack of speediness of review of detention (Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154-58, 22 May 2012).
lack of speediness of review of detention (Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154-58, 22 May 2012).
lack of speediness of review of detention (Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154-58, 22 May 2012).
lack of speediness of review of detention (Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154-58, 22 May 2012).
- RG, 05.06.1905 - 27/05
1. Unter welchen Voraussetzungen erfüllt das Entgehen eines Gewinnes im …
- KAGH, 27.04.2012 - M 12/11
Änderung der Parkordnung eines Parkhauses; Zustimmung der Mitarbeitervertretung
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2024 - 32241/18
12/11/2019.
- EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 5829/04
Russland wegen Chodorkowski verurteilt
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2024 - 32241/18
Rn. 9 In the leading cases of Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154-58, 161-65, 22 May 2012, Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, §§ 219-48, 31 May 2011, and Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493/04, §§ 75-115, 25 October 2007, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. - EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 41461/10
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2024 - 32241/18
Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose a violation of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Dirdizov v. Russia, no. 41461/10, §§ 101-11, 27 November 2012). - EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 11/05
GÜRBÜZ AND ÖZÇELIK v. TURKEY
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2024 - 32241/18
Dorogomilovskiy District Court, 11/05/2018, 27/05/2019. - EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 7064/05
MAMEDOVA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2024 - 32241/18
Where an individual's personal liberty is at stake, the Court has very strict standards concerning the State's compliance with the requirement of speedy review of the lawfulness of detention (see, for example, Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 96, 1 June 2006). - EGMR, 25.10.2007 - 4493/04
LEBEDEV v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2024 - 32241/18
Rn. 9 In the leading cases of Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 154-58, 161-65, 22 May 2012, Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, §§ 219-48, 31 May 2011, and Lebedev v. Russia, no. 4493/04, §§ 75-115, 25 October 2007, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. - EGMR, 11.07.2017 - 51249/11
ORAVEC v. CROATIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 27.06.2024 - 32241/18
Rn. 13 Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see, in particular, Oravec v. Croatia, no. 51249/11, §§ 78-80, 11 July 2017, Ayboğa and Others v. Turkey, no. 35302/08, §§ 28-30, 21 June 2016, Doherty v. the United Kingdom, no. 76874/11, §§ 113-15, 18 February 2016, Albrechtas v. Lithuania, no. 1886/06, §§ 87-89, 19 January 2016 and Karaosmanoglu and Özden v. Turkey, no. 4807/08, §§ 89-91, 17 June 2014), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
- EGMR - 55770/11 (anhängig)
TEKHNYUK v. and 9 other applications
(81932/17, Ichiyev v. Russia; 32241/18) Was the procedure by which the applicant sought to challenge the lawfulness of his pre-trial detention in conformity with Article 5 § 4 of the Convention? In particular, did the length of those proceedings comply with the "speedy" requirement of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention (see Snyatovskiy v. Russia, no. 10341/07, § 62, 13 December 2016)?.
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".