Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CHIS v. ROMANIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 09.06.2005 - 55723/00

  FADEÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 3360/03

  By finding a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in the present case, the Court has established the Government's obligation to take appropriate measures to remedy the applicant's individual situation, that is, to ensure compliance with the applicant's enforceable claim under the judgment of 14 December 1995 (compare with Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, § 142, ECHR 2005-...).
• EGMR, 02.03.2004 - 48102/99

  SABIN POPESCU c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 3360/03

  Apart from enforcement, it is only by such an annulment or substitution by the courts with an equivalent obligation that a situation of continuous non-enforcement may come to an end (see Sabin Popescu v. Romania, no. 48102/99, § 54, 2 March 2004).
• EGMR, 14.09.2011 - 74826/01

  SHOFMAN CONTRE LA FEDERATION DE RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 3360/03

  In general, it is primarily for the State concerned to choose the means to be used in its domestic legal order in order to discharge its legal obligation under Article 46 of the Convention (see Shofman v. Russia, no. 74826/01, § 53, 24 November 2005, with further references).

• EGMR, 06.09.2005 - 73970/01

  SACALEANU c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 3360/03

  The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the ones in the present case (see, among others, Sacaleanu v. Romania, no. 73970/01, 6 September 2005; Strungariu v. Romania, no. 23878/02, 29 September 2005, and Miclici v. Romania, no. 23657/03, 20 December 2007).
• EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 33343/03

  TARVERDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 3360/03

  Whether this involves employing the applicant in the job provided by that judgment or in an equivalent job or, if this is not possible, granting him reasonable compensation for non-enforcement, or a combination of these and other measures, is a decision that falls to the respondent State (see Tarverdiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 33343/03, § 66, 26 July 2007, and Ursan v. Romania, no. 35852/04, § 46, 6 April 2010).
• EGMR, 06.04.2010 - 35852/04

  URSAN v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 3360/03

  Whether this involves employing the applicant in the job provided by that judgment or in an equivalent job or, if this is not possible, granting him reasonable compensation for non-enforcement, or a combination of these and other measures, is a decision that falls to the respondent State (see Tarverdiyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 33343/03, § 66, 26 July 2007, and Ursan v. Romania, no. 35852/04, § 46, 6 April 2010).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen