Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MGELADZE v. GEORGIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Reasonable time) (englisch)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  MGELADZE v. GEORGIA

  Art. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (5)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2024 - 35413/19

  Rn. 11 The Court reiterates that the "reasonableness" of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities, and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II, and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2024 - 35413/19

  Rn. 11 The Court reiterates that the "reasonableness" of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities, and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II, and Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 11.03.2021 - 15016/07

  SCHRADE v. GEORGIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2024 - 35413/19

  As far as disciplinary action is concerned, an identical argument to that put forward by the Government in the present case was previously examined and dismissed by the Court in the case of Schrade v. Georgia ([Committee], no. 15016/07, §§ 41-42, 11 March 2021).
• EGMR, 11.02.2020 - 77209/16

  GALEA AND PAVIA v. MALTA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2024 - 35413/19

  77209/16 and 77225/16, §§ 57-58, 11 February 2020).
• EGMR, 23.05.2023 - 16783/20

  IRODOTOU v. CYPRUS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.05.2024 - 35413/19

  Moreover, the Court cannot agree with the Government's argument that the applicant has not suffered any significant disadvantage (see Irodotou v. Cyprus, no. 16783/20, § 62, 23 May 2023).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.09.2026 - 31727/23

  NADASHVILI v. GEORGIA

  As to the Government's argument concerning the reorganisation of the relevant court, the Court has previously found that poor internal organisation of the Batumi City Court and the repeated transfer of a case from one judge to another were major factors that led to lengthy proceedings (see Mgeladze v. Georgia [Committee], no. 35413/19, § 13, 16 May 2024; see also Kharitonashvili v. Georgia, no. 41957/04, § 44, 10 February 2009, with further references).
• EGMR, 11.02.2025 - 45681/22

  ZAALISHVILI v. GEORGIA

  In the absence of effective domestic remedies (see, for illustrative purposes, Schrade v. Georgia [Committee], no. 15016/07, §§ 41-42, 11 March 2021; Kadzanaia v. Georgia [Committee], no. 27178/21, §§ 9-12, 21 March 2024; Mgeladze v. Georgia [Committee], no. 35413/19, §§ 8-10, 16 May 2024; and I.B. v. Georgia [Committee], 4639/23, §§ 18-19, 11 July 2024) and while noting that the applicant does not appear to have had enquired, at least in written form, about the progress of the cassation proceedings for over five years, the Court sees no grounds on which to absolve the State of its responsibility for the stagnation of the proceedings before the Supreme Court.