Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  A.D.T. c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 8 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 14 Dommage matériel - réparation pécuniaire Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement frais et dépens ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  A.D.T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 14, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses award (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 16.03.1999 - 35765/97
• EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 35765/97

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 22.10.1981 - 7525/76

  DUDGEON c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 35765/97

  An interference with the exercise of an Article 8 right will not be compatible with Article 8 § 2 unless it is "in accordance with the law", has an aim or aims that is or are legitimate under that paragraph and is "necessary in a democratic society" for the aforesaid aim or aims (see the Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, p. 19, § 43).
• EGMR, 26.10.1988 - 10581/83

  NORRIS c. IRLANDE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 35765/97

  Those principles were adopted and repeated in the subsequent cases of Norris v. Ireland (judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142, pp. 20-21, § 46), Modinos (judgment cited above, p. 12, § 25) and Marangos v. Cyprus (application no. 31106/96, Commission's report of 3 December 1997, unpublished).
• EGMR, 22.04.1993 - 15070/89

  MODINOS c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 35765/97

  The Court recalls that the mere existence of legislation prohibiting male homosexual conduct in private may continuously and directly affect a person's private life (see, as the most recent Court case-law, the Modinos v. Cyprus judgment of 22 April 1993, Series A no. 259, p. 11, § 24).

• EGMR, 08.04.2021 - 47621/13

  Impfpflicht in Tschechien: Impflicht für Kinder ist keine …

  "The margin will tend to be relatively narrow where the right at stake is crucial to the individual's effective enjoyment of intimate or key rights" (see Dubská and Krejzová v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859/11 and 28473/12, § 178, 15 November 2016; see also, for instance, A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35765/97, § 37, ECHR 2000-IX, and Hämäläinen v. Finland [GC], no. 37359/09, §§ 68-69, ECHR 2014).
• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

    71.  The Court recalls that the margin of appreciation has been found to be narrow as regards interferences in the intimate area of an individual's sexual life (see Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, op. cit., p. 21, § 52; A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom no. 35765/97 (Sect. 3) ECHR 2000-IX, § 37).
• EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 49327/11

  Ohne Kleidung durch England: Nackt-Wanderer verliert

  However, the fact that behaviour is prohibited by the criminal law is not sufficient to bring it outside the scope of "private life" (see A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35765/97, § 23, ECHR 2000-IX; and Pay v. the United Kingdom (dec.).

 
• EGMR, 22.11.2001 - 39392/98

  G.L. AND A.V. v. AUSTRIA

  For their part, the applicants, referring to the Court's case-law, assert that any interference with a person's sexual sphere as well as any difference in treatment based on sex or sexual orientation requires particularly weighty reasons (see Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom judgment cited above, § 94; A.D.T v. the United Kingdom, no. 35765/97, 31.7.2000, § 36).
• EGMR, 30.08.2011 - 37334/08

  G. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Thus, where the activities at stake involve an intimate aspect of private life, the margin allowed to the State is generally narrow (see, mutatis mutandis, Dudgeon, cited above, § 52; and A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35765/97, § 37, ECHR 2000-IX).
• EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 32792/05

  PAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Moreover, the fact that the behaviour in question is prohibited by the criminal law is not sufficient in itself to bring it outside the scope of "private life" (see Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45; Norris v. Ireland, judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142; A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom, no. 35765/97, § 23, ECHR 2000-IX).