Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CHUKAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment);No violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  CHUKAYEV v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 34 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

• EGMR, 25.09.1992 - 13611/88

  Klaus Croissant

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2015 - 36814/06

  In this connection, the Court considers it acceptable, under the Convention, that the burden of proving insufficient means should be borne by the person who pleads such insufficiency (see Orlov, cited above, § 114, citing Croissant v. Germany, 25 September 1992, §§ 33 and 34, Series A no. 237-B).
• EGMR, 24.11.1993 - 13972/88

  IMBRIOSCIA c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2015 - 36814/06

  The requirements of Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention may also be relevant before a case is sent for trial if and in so far as the fairness of the trial is likely to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure to comply with those requirements (see Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, 24 November 1993, § 36, Series A no. 275).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 26103/95

  VAN GEYSEGHEM c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.11.2015 - 36814/06

  The Court notes at the outset that the requirements of Article 6 § 3 are to be seen as particular aspects of the right to a fair trial guaranteed by Article 6 § 1. The applicant's complaints under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 should therefore be examined together (see Van Geyseghem v. Belgium [GC], no. 26103/95, § 27, ECHR 1999-I).

• EGMR, 05.09.2023 - 6383/15

  GULIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Furthermore, those statements were neither the sole nor the decisive basis for the applicant's conviction by the domestic courts, which based their findings on further significant evidence (compare Aho v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 15065/05, § 25, 29 September 2009, and Chukayev v. Russia, no. 36814/06, § 126-27, 5 November 2015; and contrast Schatschaschwili, cited above, § 144, and Avaz Zeynalov v. Azerbaijan, nos.